Hi!
the proposal is not yet ready, so there can't be a decision or valuable
discussion at this point. Please leave me some time to finish it :)
OK, no problem. I was just surprised it's being discussed, and yet in
non-related topic :)
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect
[EMAIL
Hello Daniel,
Saturday, April 5, 2008, 3:27:33 PM, you wrote:
[Hmm... No answer in several days. Let's try this again with a
different subject]
I'm in the middle of clarifying the Overloading section of the manual,
http://docs.php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.overloading.php. Some issues
Hi Marcus:
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 10:57:22AM +0200, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Saturday, April 5, 2008, 3:27:33 PM, you wrote:
We experimented with visibility and ran into trouble.
...
So we in fact note the visibility but then ignore it.
I think we either need to respect the visibility or
Hello Daniel,
Sunday, May 25, 2008, 4:30:32 PM, you wrote:
Hi Marcus:
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 10:57:22AM +0200, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Saturday, April 5, 2008, 3:27:33 PM, you wrote:
We experimented with visibility and ran into trouble.
...
So we in fact note the visibility but then
Hi Daniel,
On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 09:27:33AM -0400, Daniel Convissor wrote:
* The new __callStatic() is neat. Thanks. Is there consideration of
adding Static versions of the other overloading methods?
It is part of the proposal for real static classes
Hi Marcus (and Sara):
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 06:48:48PM +0200, Marcus Boerger wrote:
That said there is a bug in __callStatic which we need to
report and assign to Sara.
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=45089
Thanks,
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A
[Hmm... No answer in several days. Let's try this again with a
different subject]
I'm in the middle of clarifying the Overloading section of the manual,
http://docs.php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.overloading.php. Some issues
and questions have come up and your insights will be helpful,
