From: Dmitry Stogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've attached my PHAR variation that was made some time ago
just to prove the concept. It uses standard TAR format and
doesn't use any external libraries.
In case if you call php test.tar.gz, PHP (with this
extension) will execute file
, September 10, 2007 10:09 PM
To: Andi Gutmans
Cc: David Coallier; PHP Developers Mailing List
Subject: Why not jar for phar? (was Re: [PHP-DEV] PHAR was PHP 5.3
Suggested Feature List)
Andi Gutmans wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
: Why not jar for phar? (was Re:
[PHP-DEV] PHAR was PHP 5.3 Suggested Feature List)
Hello Andi,
to end this 'many tools' reasoning. For those issues we
already adopted zip and if people insist I wouldn't mind if
anybody would provide a working tar implementation that
allows reading
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 11, 2007, at 05:42:50, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Andi,
to end this 'many tools' reasoning. For those issues we already
adopted
zip and if people insist I wouldn't mind if anybody would provide a
working
tar implementation that
BuildSmart wrote:
On Sep 11, 2007, at 05:42:50, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Andi,
to end this 'many tools' reasoning. For those issues we already
adopted
zip and if people insist I wouldn't mind if anybody would provide a
working
tar implementation that allows reading of tgz and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 11, 2007, at 09:58:16, Gregory Beaver wrote:
BuildSmart wrote:
On Sep 11, 2007, at 05:42:50, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Andi,
to end this 'many tools' reasoning. For those issues we already
adopted
zip and if people insist I
On 9/11/07, BuildSmart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It might seem trivial to others because you're not reading the source
correctly. SPL is not disabled when phar is enabled.
doesn't the following mean it's disabled or am I interpreting it wrong?
PHP_ADD_EXTENSION_DEP(phar, spl, false)
nope.
Yes, I will ask Dmitry to share it with you. There's huge value in
having a standard format which existing tools can already manipulate. It
doesn't have to be tar but IMO it should be something standard.
Andi
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Beaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9/10/07, Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I will ask Dmitry to share it with you. There's huge value in
having a standard format which existing tools can already manipulate. It
doesn't have to be tar but IMO it should be something standard.
Andi
-Original Message-
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Coallier
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 4:05 PM
To: Andi Gutmans
Cc: Gregory Beaver; PHP Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHAR was PHP 5.3 Suggested Feature List
Andi
Andi Gutmans wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Coallier
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 4:05 PM
To: Andi Gutmans
Cc: Gregory Beaver; PHP Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHAR was PHP 5.3 Suggested Feature
: [PHP-DEV] PHAR was PHP 5.3 Suggested Feature List
Andi, if there was to be a cross platform tool to view, extract,
add,
etc with phar archives, would that influence your choice ?
Well the point is that if you're using tar, zip (jar) or some other
standard file format you have
12 matches
Mail list logo
