Sean Coates wrote:
The strcat results were approximately *10 times slower* on 5.2.1 than on
5.2.0.
Upping the number significantly (from 20 to 2000) smooths out
abnormalities:
5.2.0:
strcat(2000) 5.556
5.2.1:
strcat(2000) 5.628
Which I hope helps my uneducated
Andrew Hutchings writes
I dunno what the heck I am doing wrong then :)
I have tried on a PPC running OSX, a Xen host on a Dual Xeon
running Ubuntu Edgy, an EPIA running Ubuntu Edgy and the Xeon
devel box.
When configuring with ./configure --disable-all
--disable-cgi and compiling with
I've run the bench on a development box at work. A hefty box with no load,
running Fedora Core 5.
The strcat results were approximately *10 times slower* on 5.2.1 than on
5.2.0.
Everything else was nominal.
Could you send your phpinfo() and the script you tested (or if it was
bench.php from
Stanislav Malyshev schrieb:
The strcat results were approximately *10 times slower* on 5.2.1 than on
5.2.0.
Everything else was nominal.
Could you send your phpinfo() and the script you tested (or if it was
bench.php from CVS then its output)?
I see only tests on *nix boxes... Here is
The strcat results were approximately *10 times slower* on 5.2.1 than on
5.2.0.
Upping the number significantly (from 20 to 2000) smooths out
abnormalities:
5.2.0:
strcat(2000) 5.556
5.2.1:
strcat(2000) 5.628
These results are typical for a few runs of each (fresh
Antony Dovgal wrote:
On 02/26/2007 05:12 AM, Andrew Hutchings wrote:
Much better than the score I was getting for 5.2.1 although some of the
tests are slightly slower than 5.2.0.
I'm sure if won't see any difference if you run the bench a dozen of
times, the results depend on current system
Antony Dovgal wrote:
I'm sure if won't see any difference if you run the bench a dozen of
times, the results depend on current system status.
I've just compiled both 5.2.0 and 5.2.1 on my low powered trash box (a
1GHz ViA EPIA) using:
./configure --disable-all --disable-cgi
No CFLAGS were
I'm sure if won't see any difference if you run the bench a dozen of
times, the results depend on current system status.
I tried to run test on my machine, could not reproduce the effect.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/
--
PHP Internals -
Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
I tried to run test on my machine, could not reproduce the effect.
I've run the bench script on my Redhat-FC6 box with 5.2.0 and 5.2.1, configs
exactly the same. I could not reproduce the effect either. [phew]
Best Regards
Mike Robinson
--
PHP Internals - PHP
Mike Robinson wrote:
Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
I tried to run test on my machine, could not reproduce the effect.
I've run the bench script on my Redhat-FC6 box with 5.2.0 and 5.2.1, configs
exactly the same. I could not reproduce the effect either. [phew]
I dunno what the heck I am doing
Hi,
I have been compiling 5.2.1 and comparing it with 5.2.0. The
development box I am using is a Xeon 3.4 GHz with 4 cores (not sure if
its 2xdual core or what, but not relevant here). I am compiling using
-O2 -march=i686 -msse2.
When running bench.php
On 02/26/2007 01:06 AM, Andrew Hutchings wrote:
Hi,
I have been compiling 5.2.1 and comparing it with 5.2.0. The
development box I am using is a Xeon 3.4 GHz with 4 cores (not sure if
its 2xdual core or what, but not relevant here). I am compiling using
-O2 -march=i686 -msse2.
When running
Antony Dovgal wrote:
I guess you were using different configure options, but I don't know,
you didn't say anything about that..
Personally I can't see any difference between 5.2.0 (14.4 +- 0.1) and
5.2.1 (14.4 +- 0.1) on my laptop.
Apologies, I'm using the same configure options for both
On 02/26/2007 01:58 AM, Andrew Hutchings wrote:
Antony Dovgal wrote:
I guess you were using different configure options, but I don't know,
you didn't say anything about that..
Personally I can't see any difference between 5.2.0 (14.4 +- 0.1) and
5.2.1 (14.4 +- 0.1) on my laptop.
Apologies,
Antony Dovgal wrote:
Please remove all these options and try with just ./configure
--disable-all.
Will do in the morning and report back. I will also try an un-optimised
standard i386 build of each as see what happens.
If it is any help (forgot to mention before) I am using gcc 4.1.0 and
the
On 02/26/2007 02:26 AM, Andrew Hutchings wrote:
Antony Dovgal wrote:
Please remove all these options and try with just ./configure
--disable-all.
Will do in the morning and report back. I will also try an un-optimised
standard i386 build of each as see what happens.
Thanks in advance.
Btw,
Antony Dovgal wrote:
Thanks in advance.
Btw, I would appreciate if you also try 5.2.2-dev snapshot, just to see
if it makes any difference.
Up very late with my youngest son being sick so just compiled the
snapshot made about 40 minutes ago with the same options, here are the
results:
simple
Antony Dovgal wrote:
I believe updating GCC to the latest version (4.1.2) might also help,
GCC 4.1.x is known to be extremely picky in some cases.
I didn't feel like overhauling GCC just this minute so instead I used
GCC 3.4.6 that is also in this box with just the -O2 and -march=i386
flags and
On 02/26/2007 05:12 AM, Andrew Hutchings wrote:
Antony Dovgal wrote:
Thanks in advance.
Btw, I would appreciate if you also try 5.2.2-dev snapshot, just to see
if it makes any difference.
Up very late with my youngest son being sick so just compiled the
snapshot made about 40 minutes ago with
19 matches
Mail list logo
