Hello Etienne,
If static:: in static context behaves like $this in object context, it would
be much meaningful. If we introduce the meta class concept in PHP, then
each class is an instance of the meta class, thus we can treat a class as an
object, and then it is natural that static members
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My original reply missed the list :|
Hi,
i've written the following code using Etiennes LSB. But I'm facing some
problems.
?php
class A {
function foo() {
echo get_called_class();
}
}
class B
Hello,
that's it. Even
$b = new B;
$b-foo(); // echos B - good
works.
Thank you!
*.sebastian
Sebastian Deutsch schrieb:
Hello,
care... my case is slightly different. I was aware of that problem, but
in my case I call B::foo() from the main scope - it behaves right -
when I call it
Hello,
care... my case is slightly different. I was aware of that problem, but
in my case I call B::foo() from the main scope - it behaves right -
when I call it within the scope of C (same call) it behaves different.
This is different as described in the bug. The same call should
have the same
Hello, Sebastian
This seems to be a known bug http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=43408 and in
fact already assigned.
Fallbacks occur in static/self calls, as static/self resolve to foo
and it returns foo as expected.
However, when you do a parent::demo() you actually call bar::demo(),
which is
Hello,
your foo function is not defined as static, hence no static call is done.
Strict Standards: Non-static method A::foo() should not be called statically,
assuming $this from incompatible context ...
Define your method as static and it should work just fine.
Regards
On Feb 11, 2008
Hello,
i've written the following code using Etiennes LSB. But I'm facing some
problems.
?php
class A {
function foo() {
echo get_called_class();
}
}
class B extends A {
}
class C {
function moo() {
B::foo();
}
