Re: [PHP-DEV] RC1 of RC1

2004-03-19 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
Clemens Gutweiler wrote: > Change the name of 'test' to 'test2', so that this isn't anymore an > construcor - then the E_STRICT message appears. Bug? Damn those stupid BC-constructor-names :) -- Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/ Das B

RE: [PHP-DEV] RC1 of RC1

2004-03-19 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 11:00 AM 3/19/2004 +0100, Clemens Gutweiler wrote: > From: Derick Rethans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > > > Andi Gutmans wrote: > > > Only if you use E_STRICT. > > > > Am I missing something (bear with me, I am still on > medication :-) but > >

RE: [PHP-DEV] RC1 of RC1

2004-03-19 Thread Clemens Gutweiler
> From: Derick Rethans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > > > Andi Gutmans wrote: > > > Only if you use E_STRICT. > > > > Am I missing something (bear with me, I am still on > medication :-) but > > the following code does not print a warning here:

Re: [PHP-DEV] RC1 of RC1

2004-03-19 Thread Derick Rethans
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > Andi Gutmans wrote: > > Only if you use E_STRICT. > > Am I missing something (bear with me, I am still on medication :-) but > the following code does not print a warning here: Because E_Strict is set at run time, and the warnings are thrown at

Re: [PHP-DEV] RC1 of RC1

2004-03-19 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
Andi Gutmans wrote: > Only if you use E_STRICT. Am I missing something (bear with me, I am still on medication :-) but the following code does not print a warning here: -- Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/ Das Buch zu PHP 5: ht

Re: [PHP-DEV] RC1 of RC1

2004-03-17 Thread Hans Lellelid
Andi Gutmans wrote: Nope. The final decision was to only check this during E_STRICT because there's no reason why inheritance should be different from implementation. People here felt that due to PHP not supporting function overloading we should not be very strict, and therefore, only give thi

Re: [PHP-DEV] RC1 of RC1

2004-03-17 Thread Andi Gutmans
Nope. The final decision was to only check this during E_STRICT because there's no reason why inheritance should be different from implementation. People here felt that due to PHP not supporting function overloading we should not be very strict, and therefore, only give this warning in E_STRICT.

Re: [PHP-DEV] RC1 of RC1

2004-03-17 Thread Hans Lellelid
Hi - Andi Gutmans wrote: Only if you use E_STRICT. There was a long discussion about this on internals@ a few weeks ago. At 11:57 AM 3/17/2004 +0100, Clemens Gutweiler wrote: interface person { function wakeup( $day, $time ); } class hugo implements per

RE: [PHP-DEV] RC1 of RC1

2004-03-17 Thread Andi Gutmans
Only if you use E_STRICT. There was a long discussion about this on internals@ a few weeks ago. At 11:57 AM 3/17/2004 +0100, Clemens Gutweiler wrote: Hi, > From: Andi Gutmans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I rolled RC1 of RC1 (didn't change the version from -dev on > purpose because > RC1RC1 is ki

RE: [PHP-DEV] RC1 of RC1

2004-03-17 Thread Clemens Gutweiler
Hi, > From: Andi Gutmans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I rolled RC1 of RC1 (didn't change the version from -dev on > purpose because > RC1RC1 is kind of odd and I didn't want it to confuse people :). > I will roll RC1 on the 17th so if there are "serious" show > stoppers speak up. wakeup( 'mon

Re: [PHP-DEV] RC1 of RC1

2004-03-16 Thread Timm Friebe
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 22:28, Marcus Boerger wrote: > Hello Timm, > > this is fixed now. Verified. - Timm -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] RC1 of RC1

2004-03-16 Thread Marcus Boerger
Hello Timm, this is fixed now. marcus Tuesday, March 16, 2004, 9:39:09 PM, you wrote: > On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 07:10, Andi Gutmans wrote: >> Hey, >> >> I rolled RC1 of RC1 (didn't change the version from -dev on purpose because >> RC1RC1 is kind of odd and I didn't want it to confuse people :)

Re: [PHP-DEV] RC1 of RC1

2004-03-16 Thread Timm Friebe
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 07:10, Andi Gutmans wrote: > Hey, > > I rolled RC1 of RC1 (didn't change the version from -dev on purpose because > RC1RC1 is kind of odd and I didn't want it to confuse people :). > I will roll RC1 on the 17th so if there are "serious" show stoppers speak up. [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [PHP-DEV] RC1 of RC1

2004-03-15 Thread Jan Schneider
Zitat von Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I fixed get_object_vars() a couple of days ago. Can you check if this still occurs? No, that seems to have fixed it, thanks! At 01:52 PM 3/15/2004 +0100, Jan Schneider wrote: Zitat von Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I will roll RC1 on the 17th so if

Re: [PHP-DEV] RC1 of RC1

2004-03-15 Thread Andi Gutmans
I fixed get_object_vars() a couple of days ago. Can you check if this still occurs? Andi At 01:52 PM 3/15/2004 +0100, Jan Schneider wrote: Zitat von Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I will roll RC1 on the 17th so if there are "serious" show stoppers speak up. Dunno what you consider "serious",

Re: [PHP-DEV] RC1 of RC1

2004-03-15 Thread Jan Schneider
Zitat von Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I will roll RC1 on the 17th so if there are "serious" show stoppers speak up. Dunno what you consider "serious", but bug 2 http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=2 is on the ze2 level. Jan. -- http://www.horde.org - The Horde Project http://www.ammma.de

[PHP-DEV] RC1 of RC1

2004-03-14 Thread Andi Gutmans
Hey, I rolled RC1 of RC1 (didn't change the version from -dev on purpose because RC1RC1 is kind of odd and I didn't want it to confuse people :). I will roll RC1 on the 17th so if there are "serious" show stoppers speak up. The .tar.gz/.tar.bz2 are available at http://snaps.php.net/~andi Edin, ca