Hi.
Recently the setters/getters rfc was declined.
Other than the vote, was there any technical reasons?
I've been sitting here and had a thought.
Currently, if I use ...
?php
class some_base_class {}
?
I can, sort of, think of this as ...
?php
class some_base_class extends \stdClass {}
?
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Richard Quadling rquadl...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi.
Recently the setters/getters rfc was declined.
Other than the vote, was there any technical reasons?
I've been sitting here and had a thought.
Currently, if I use ...
?php
class some_base_class {}
?
I
On 3 June 2013 17:55, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Richard Quadling rquadl...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi.
Recently the setters/getters rfc was declined.
Other than the vote, was there any technical reasons?
I've been sitting here and had a thought.
I think the point was that if somebody wants to extend one another class,
maybe one of the SPL classes for example, they can't also extend the base
class with getter/setter support so it's an incomplete solution that will
frustrate many users.
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Richard Quadling
Hi Nikita
2013/6/3 Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com:
PHP does not support multiple inheritance. So no, this doesn't solve really
the issue.
This is also why this makes a lot more sense to implement as an
Interface as we can implement more than one per class, much like we do
with ArrayAccess.
On 3 June 2013 18:22, Brandon Wamboldt bran...@brandonwamboldt.ca wrote:
I think the point was that if somebody wants to extend one another class,
maybe one of the SPL classes for example, they can't also extend the base
class with getter/setter support so it's an incomplete solution that will
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Richard Quadling rquadl...@gmail.comwrote:
On 3 June 2013 18:22, Brandon Wamboldt bran...@brandonwamboldt.ca wrote:
I think the point was that if somebody wants to extend one another class,
maybe one of the SPL classes for example, they can't also extend the
