Fixed.
--Jani
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Joe Orton wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 05:47:09PM +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>>
>> Actually, it propably is okay to just use __GMP_BITS_PER_MP_LIMB
>> and not include gmp-mparam.h at all?
>
>Ah, yes, that looks right: BITS_PER_MP_LIMB
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 05:47:09PM +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>
> Actually, it propably is okay to just use __GMP_BITS_PER_MP_LIMB
> and not include gmp-mparam.h at all?
Ah, yes, that looks right: BITS_PER_MP_LIMB is only defined for arches
where gmp has an assembler implementation; if g
Actually, it propably is okay to just use __GMP_BITS_PER_MP_LIMB
and not include gmp-mparam.h at all?
--Jani
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>
> That would be strange since I have the same GMP version..
> With these RH9 rpms:
>
> gmp-4.1.2-2
>
That would be strange since I have the same GMP version..
With these RH9 rpms:
gmp-4.1.2-2
gmp-devel-4.1.2-2
Some other buggie..?
--Jani
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Joe Orton wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 04:44:07AM -, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 04:44:07AM -, Jani Taskinen wrote:
...
...
> +
> + GMPG(rand_initialized) = 1;
> + }
> + mpz_urandomb(*gmpnum_result, GMPG(rand_state), GMP_ABS (limiter) *
> BITS_PER_MP_LIMB);
>
Do you have a release of gmp older than 4.1.2 maybe? There is only
_
