On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Paul Biggar paul.big...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Georg,
Thanks for the quick reply.
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Georg Gradwohlgeorg.gradw...@gmail.com
wrote:
thanks for the notice. To cut a long story short: we've discussed the use
of
the
Hi Alex,
no, there aren't so far. The reason for trying around with some mem-tests at
the moment is that we were running out of memory while executing the
run-tests. So we had to find the reason for this. Se we're currently not
optimizing the code, we're just trying to get the script running
Hi Georg,
I notice this commit that looks like a benchmark. I'm trying to figure
out if the new run-tests rewrite overlaps with the benchmarks GSoC
project (you might not have been aware since we have the discussions
on php-qa). I wouldn't mind hearing your thoughts so that we avoid
duplicated
Hi Paul,
thanks for the notice. To cut a long story short: we've discussed the use of
the SPL-File-Iterator in the runtests-project. So I created a very simple
test which passes through an array to compare the performance of the
spl-iterator to a for-loop.
So I think this is no overlap with
Hi Georg,
Thanks for the quick reply.
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Georg Gradwohlgeorg.gradw...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks for the notice. To cut a long story short: we've discussed the use of
the SPL-File-Iterator in the runtests-project. So I created a very simple
test which passes through
