Nikita, Thanks for the clarification.
That's exactly what I intended to do.
> can you update the RFC with more information about this functionality?
I understand. Organize them and reconstruct the RFC text.
I've also created an RFC about moving RNG-related functions from
ext/standard to
Nikita Popov wrote on 9/6/21 03:06:
> On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 7:40 PM Ben Ramsey wrote:
>
>> Go Kudo wrote on 9/4/21 23:00:
>>> Indeed, it may be true that these suggestions should not be made all at
>>> once. If necessary, I would like to propose to organize the RNG
>>> implementation first.
>>>
On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 7:40 PM Ben Ramsey wrote:
> Go Kudo wrote on 9/4/21 23:00:
> > Indeed, it may be true that these suggestions should not be made all at
> > once. If necessary, I would like to propose to organize the RNG
> > implementation first.
> >
> > Do we still need an RFC in this
Hi Ben,
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021, 12:40 AM Ben Ramsey wrote:
> Go Kudo wrote on 9/4/21 23:00:
> > Indeed, it may be true that these suggestions should not be made all at
> > once. If necessary, I would like to propose to organize the RNG
> > implementation first.
> >
>
>
> The OOP API appears to be
Go Kudo wrote on 9/4/21 23:00:
> Indeed, it may be true that these suggestions should not be made all at
> once. If necessary, I would like to propose to organize the RNG
> implementation first.
>
> Do we still need an RFC in this case? I'm not sure I'm not fully understand
> the criteria for an
Indeed, it may be true that these suggestions should not be made all at
once. If necessary, I would like to propose to organize the RNG
implementation first.
Do we still need an RFC in this case? I'm not sure I'm not fully understand
the criteria for an RFC. Does this internal API change count as
Go Kudo wrote on 9/2/21 10:10:
> Hi Internals.
>
> Expanded from the previous RFC and changed it to an RFC that organizes the
> whole PHP random number generator. Also, the target version has been
> changed to 8.2.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/rng_extension
>
