On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 11:32 AM Nikita Popov wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> I've sent a mail about this before, but as this turned into a bit of a
> larger change (also allowing "abstract private" methods in traits) and
> there's some backwards compatibility impact, I've created a proper RFC for
> th
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 10:40 PM Levi Morrison
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 8:01 AM Nikita Popov wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 11:32 AM Nikita Popov
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi internals,
> > >
> > > I've sent a mail about this before, but as this turned into a bit of a
> > > larger change
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 8:01 AM Nikita Popov wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 11:32 AM Nikita Popov wrote:
>
> > Hi internals,
> >
> > I've sent a mail about this before, but as this turned into a bit of a
> > larger change (also allowing "abstract private" methods in traits) and
> > there's some
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 11:32 AM Nikita Popov wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> I've sent a mail about this before, but as this turned into a bit of a
> larger change (also allowing "abstract private" methods in traits) and
> there's some backwards compatibility impact, I've created a proper RFC for
> th
