On 2012-03-02, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
It should have been done before 5.4.0 was out, but better late than never.
I put together four options here:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php53eol
I'm in favor of option #1, as it gives enough time to our users to
migrate by reducing the
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 10:27 -0500, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
On 2012-03-02, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
It should have been done before 5.4.0 was out, but better late than never.
I put together four options here:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php53eol
I'm in favor of
hi Matthew,
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney
weierophin...@php.net wrote:
Considering that 5.3 adoption is still eclipsed by 5.2 adoption, to be
honest, it feels like doing 1 year bugfix + 1 year security fix is the
minimum necessary. By the time we get good adoption of
On 5 March 2012 17:20, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
hi Matthew,
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney
weierophin...@php.net wrote:
Considering that 5.3 adoption is still eclipsed by 5.2 adoption, to be
honest, it feels like doing 1 year bugfix + 1 year
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Bostjan Skufca bost...@a2o.si wrote:
This has to be stressed time and again, in order to start changing current
perception that upgrading to newer PHP release is a major PITA.
I suppose you mean not anymore :)
Then go out there to spread the new message and
On 5 March 2012 17:45, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Bostjan Skufca bost...@a2o.si wrote:
This has to be stressed time and again, in order to start changing
current
perception that upgrading to newer PHP release is a major PITA.
I suppose you
