On 18/12/14 01:38, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Dec 17, 2014 5:26 PM, Michael Wallner m...@php.net
mailto:m...@php.net wrote:
Just a minor update: the two PECL depencies have been ported to ZE3.
Btw, I still wonder if their features could be provided as part of php
instead of having to add 3
On 19/08/14 09:49, Michael Wallner wrote:
Hi PHP internals!
I've created an RFC for discussion:
Whether it is feasible to add pecl_http v2 to the core.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/pecl_http
Just a minor update: the two PECL depencies have been ported to ZE3.
--
Regards,
Mike
--
On Dec 17, 2014 5:26 PM, Michael Wallner m...@php.net wrote:
On 19/08/14 09:49, Michael Wallner wrote:
Hi PHP internals!
I've created an RFC for discussion:
Whether it is feasible to add pecl_http v2 to the core.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/pecl_http
Just a minor update: the
Michael Wallner in php.internals (Tue, 19 Aug 2014 09:49:34 +0200):
Hi PHP internals!
I've created an RFC for discussion:
Whether it is feasible to add pecl_http v2 to the core.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/pecl_http
Is pecl_http v2 still dependent on propro and raphf? If so, they should
be
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Jan Ehrhardt php...@ehrhardt.nl wrote:
Michael Wallner in php.internals (Tue, 19 Aug 2014 09:49:34 +0200):
Hi PHP internals!
I've created an RFC for discussion:
Whether it is feasible to add pecl_http v2 to the core.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/pecl_http
On 19 August 2014 11:17, Jan Ehrhardt php...@ehrhardt.nl wrote:
Is pecl_http v2 still dependent on propro and raphf? If so, they should
be in core as well.
Yes, they are mentioned in the Open Issues section.
--
Regards,
Mike
On 19 August 2014 11:24, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Jan Ehrhardt php...@ehrhardt.nl wrote:
Is pecl_http v2 still dependent on propro and raphf? If so, they should
be in core as well.
I never really understood why they are needed or why they
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Michael Wallner m...@php.net wrote:
On 19 August 2014 11:24, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Jan Ehrhardt php...@ehrhardt.nl wrote:
Is pecl_http v2 still dependent on propro and raphf? If so, they should
be in core
On 19/08/14 09:49, Michael Wallner wrote:
Hi PHP internals!
I've created an RFC for discussion:
Whether it is feasible to add pecl_http v2 to the core.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/pecl_http
Just a heads up. People seem very confused because they read the docs on
php.net and don't
