On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 5:14 PM Mark Randall wrote:
> On 07/05/2019 15:22, Gert wrote:
> > My idea, extremely summarized, would be to take the functions that
> > return false/null when they 'error', and instead make them actually
> > throw an error.
>
> It comes up on various discussion forums
On 07/05/2019 15:22, Gert wrote:
My idea, extremely summarized, would be to take the functions that
return false/null when they 'error', and instead make them actually
throw an error.
It comes up on various discussion forums every other month. There's a
few downsides to it, but mainly that
