Well, yes, but not exactly.
What I dislike on ?? operator is, that it supress all warnings in the
expression - in my opinion it shares the same
issue as @ operator and why people discourage other to use it - because
it may supress far more errors than you want
to supress. And this is the case
David Kolář wrote on 9/4/21 17:19:
> Back to the suggestion - I suggest creating a new IFNULL operator, which
> will simply test if
> expression is null. If not, it returns left-hand part, if yes, it
> returns right-hand part.
This is already what the `??` operator does. For example:
