Ben Scholzen 'DASPRiD' wrote:
>
> I tested libxml_use_internal_errors() with XMLReader now, and it doesn't
> really work as intended. When calling $reader->read(), and reaching an
> invalid node, there is in fact the error stored in libxml_get_errors(),
> but PHP additionally still throws a "parse
Hannes Magnusson wrote on 30.07.2009 10:48:
> Are you intentionally ignoring what I've said previously in the thread?
> Please stop using SimpleXML as an example. You do not need @.
> libxml_use_internal_errors(true);
> $sxe = simplexml_load_string("");
> if (!$sxe) {
> echo "Failed loading XML\
Hannes Magnusson wrote on 31.07.2009 11:35:
> I'll add some "see also" links and add an "errors" section mentioning it too.
>
> -Hannes
Same for XMLReader then, please.
--
...
: ___ _ ___ ___ ___ _ ___:
: | \ /_\ / __| _ \ _ (_) \ :
: | |) / _ \\__
Le Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:35:45 +0200, Hannes Magnusson a écrit :
> I just realized we don't link to that function from the simplexml docs.
>
> I'll add some "see also" links and add an "errors" section mentioning it
> too.
>
> -Hannes
Thank you for the documentation :)
--
PHP Internals - PHP Ru
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 23:17, Markus Fischer wrote:
> Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 20:28, Joey Smith wrote:
>>> However, now that it's come up, I'm wondering what the costs/risks are
>>> of setting libxml_use_internal_errors() on by default?
>>
>> I don't think thats a good i
>Le Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:48:49 +0200, Hannes Magnusson a écrit :
>
> Are you intentionally ignoring what I've said previously in the thread?
> Please stop using SimpleXML as an example. You do not need @. libxml_use_internal_errors(true);
> [...]
>
> Again. The examples you are looking for are ne
Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 20:28, Joey Smith wrote:
>> However, now that it's come up, I'm wondering what the costs/risks are
>> of setting libxml_use_internal_errors() on by default?
>
> I don't think thats a good idea.
> People are used to getting a warning when stuff fail
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 20:28, Joey Smith wrote:
> However, now that it's come up, I'm wondering what the costs/risks are
> of setting libxml_use_internal_errors() on by default?
I don't think thats a good idea.
People are used to getting a warning when stuff fails, and suppressing
them all of the
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:48:49AM +0200, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> No PHP warnings at all.
>
>
> Again. The examples you are looking for are network issues with
> fopen(), file_get_contents() and such things.
>
> -Hannes
Hannes, these are actually the ones I had in mind when I sent my last
ema
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 23:33, Alban wrote:
> Le Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:23:21 +0200, user a écrit :
>
>> I published a (work in progress) RFC today about replacing certain
>> errors with exceptions. I know that there already was something similiar
>> on the php6dev blog, but this is not completly the
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 05:33:18PM -0400, Alban wrote:
> The result is it's impossible to use this function without @ statement.
SimpleXML is hardly alone here, but I would imagine that if we could identify
these and get bugs opened on them, there'd be very little resistance to fixing
that aspect.
Le Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:23:21 +0200, user a écrit :
I published a (work in progress) RFC today about replacing certain
errors with exceptions. I know that there already was something
similiar on the php6dev blog, but this is not completly the same,
so awating your comments:
http://wiki.php.net/r
Le Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:23:21 +0200, user a écrit :
> I published a (work in progress) RFC today about replacing certain
> errors with exceptions. I know that there already was something similiar
> on the php6dev blog, but this is not completly the same, so awating your
> comments:
>
> http://wiki
13 matches
Mail list logo
