Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: SNAPS+SNAPSPecl different to Pecl4Win

2007-07-13 Thread Richard Quadling
On 12/07/07, Gaetano Giunta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think I finally have something demoable, regarding the possibility of extending pecl4win to offer compiled dlls of the released version pf pecl packages, besides the compiled cvs version. The build process is almost ok: + two separate buil

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: SNAPS+SNAPSPecl different to Pecl4Win

2007-07-12 Thread Gaetano Giunta
I think I finally have something demoable, regarding the possibility of extending pecl4win to offer compiled dlls of the released version pf pecl packages, besides the compiled cvs version. The build process is almost ok: + two separate build environments (incl. pecl trees) are used: one for p

[PHP-DEV] Re: SNAPS+SNAPSPecl different to Pecl4Win

2007-06-28 Thread Gaetano Giunta
Thanks for your encouraging words. I ran a "complete" build today against php 5.2.3, and these are the stats: - 134 packaged extensions downloaded from pecl website (sniffed the list out of cvs.php.net, then got the latest existing package for every one) of those: only 61 have a config.w32 fil

[PHP-DEV] Re: SNAPS+SNAPSPecl different to Pecl4Win

2007-06-27 Thread Greg Beaver
Gaetano Giunta wrote: > >> ... >> The first problem I have found is that the APC extension (the first I >> tested) has no config.w32 file included in the distribution, even >> though one is present in CVS (and has been for quite a while afaict). >> This prevents a successful build of the extension

[PHP-DEV] Re: SNAPS+SNAPSPecl different to Pecl4Win

2007-06-27 Thread Gaetano Giunta
... The first problem I have found is that the APC extension (the first I tested) has no config.w32 file included in the distribution, even though one is present in CVS (and has been for quite a while afaict). This prevents a successful build of the extensions under windows (note: I only test

[PHP-DEV] Re: SNAPS+SNAPSPecl different to Pecl4Win

2007-06-27 Thread Gaetano Giunta
As a side note, I've been slowly chugging away (sorry, it's my first php build on windows ever) on modified pecl4win scripts that would build extensions starting from pecl releases instead of pulling the code from cvs. The first problem I have found is that the APC extension (the first I teste

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: SNAPS+SNAPSPecl different to Pecl4Win

2007-06-18 Thread Richard Quadling
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "internals" Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 11:53 AM Subject: [PHP-DEV] Re: SNAPS+SNAPSPecl different to Pecl4Win > Anyone? > > > > On 29/05/07, Richard Quadling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi. >> >> If you take the

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: SNAPS+SNAPSPecl different to Pecl4Win

2007-06-18 Thread Steph Fox
We all know it's problematic already. Everyone's looking for solutions rather than complaints here :) - Original Message - From: "Richard Quadling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "internals" Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 11:53 AM Subject: [PHP-DEV] Re: S

[PHP-DEV] Re: SNAPS+SNAPSPecl different to Pecl4Win

2007-06-18 Thread Richard Quadling
Anyone? On 29/05/07, Richard Quadling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi. If you take the extensions in http://snaps.php.net/win32/php5.2-win32-200705291230.zip (has 45 extensions) and in http://snaps.php.net/win32/pecl5.2-win32-200705291230.zip (has 77 extensions). They are all dated the same dat