Committed.
On Dec 19, 2006, at 6:36 PM, Matt Wilmas wrote:
Hi Andrei,
Yeah, I see the patch you committed also included the changes that
were made
since my reply yesterday... I've attached a patch that removes a few
lines
that aren't present in the non-Unicode version.
Matt
- Origi
Hi Andrei,
Yeah, I see the patch you committed also included the changes that were made
since my reply yesterday... I've attached a patch that removes a few lines
that aren't present in the non-Unicode version.
Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Andrei Zmievski"
Sent: Tuesday, December
Is this better?
Index: ext/standard/formatted_print.c
===
RCS file: /repository/php-src/ext/standard/formatted_print.c,v
retrieving revision 1.89
diff -p -u -r1.89 formatted_print.c
--- ext/standard/formatted_print.c 18 Dec 2006
Hi Andrei,
Just a couple things I noticed in _appenddouble... In the first switch (),
'F' is being changed to 'f', and in the second switch, 'F' needs to be moved
down with 'f'. Those changes were just made in v1.89 of the file.
Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Andrei Zmievski"
Sent:
The update patch is attached. If there are no objections, I'd like to
commit.
-Andrei
Index: ext/standard/formatted_print.c
===
RCS file: /repository/php-src/ext/standard/formatted_print.c,v
retrieving revision 1.89
diff -p -u -r1.
> I know we had discussion about *fprintf() on IRC,
> but I'm still not clear on some stuff.
>
> Sara, could you please explain again why UG(unicode)
> should not be used as the selection for
> php_formatted_print/php_u_formatted_print? I
> bet a few of us are hazy on the streams Unicode/binary
>
I know we had discussion about *fprintf() on IRC, but I'm still not
clear on some stuff.
Sara, could you please explain again why UG(unicode) should not be
used as the selection for php_formatted_print/php_u_formatted_print? I
bet a few of us are hazy on the streams Unicode/binary details,
