We already have a git repository where we keep historical branches, we
don't need to create another.
I'm really not sure what the problem is here, and we have spent far too
long discussing this non issue.
Cheers
Joe
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 23:23, Olumide Samson wrote:
> >
> > Maybe it might nec
>
> Maybe it might necessarily not need be removed, if this might be a better
> idea, why shouldn't there be a php-archive or something like that as a git
> account or repository where all those historical branches may be kept for
> historical access?
>
> I think removing isn't making sense to me a
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 01:06, G. P. B. wrote:
>
> Hello internal,
>
> It seems this topic already has been raised a year ago [1] but nothing has
> been done.
> So I would like to raise the issue again, there are a various of old and
> empty branches currently in git, would it be possible to remove
I saw the list and the ages, what I didn't see was a justification for
removing them.
I think a proper analysis hasn't really been performed, for example the
native-tls branch was merged after ng into the 7.0 series, and I didn't
remove it because it serves as a reference point for the old vs the
On 19.08.2019 at 04:08, Sara Golemon wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 6:06 PM G. P. B. wrote:
>
>> It seems this topic already has been raised a year ago [1] but nothing has
>> been done.
>> So I would like to raise the issue again, there are a various of old and
>> empty branches currently in gi
Hello,
I think the list compiled in the initial email done by *Gabriel Caruso* [1]
is a good starting point.
Copied here for reference.
15+ years old:
- experimental/RETURN_REF
- experimetnal/RETURN_REF_PATCH
- experimental/pre_new_hash_func
- experimental/zts_stdc_scanners
- exp
Morning,
I pretty much just echo what Sara said, I'm not sure what harm they are
doing ...
Cheers
Joe
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 04:09, Sara Golemon wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 6:06 PM G. P. B. wrote:
>
> > It seems this topic already has been raised a year ago [1] but nothing
> has
> > been
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 6:06 PM G. P. B. wrote:
> It seems this topic already has been raised a year ago [1] but nothing has
> been done.
> So I would like to raise the issue again, there are a various of old and
> empty branches currently in git, would it be possible to remove them?
>
> 1/ Which
Hello internal,
It seems this topic already has been raised a year ago [1] but nothing has
been done.
So I would like to raise the issue again, there are a various of old and
empty branches currently in git, would it be possible to remove them?
Best regards
George P. Banyard
[1] https://externa
