On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Thomas Hruska thru...@cubiclesoft.comwrote:
It is approaching 2 1/2 years since the last release of PHP 5.2. 5.2 has
been declared dead on more than one occasion around here. The dust has
more or less settled since PHP 5.3 EOL was announced. The ONLY reason
hi,
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Thomas Hruska thru...@cubiclesoft.comwrote:
It is approaching 2 1/2 years since the last release of PHP 5.2. 5.2 has
been declared dead on more than one occasion around here. The dust
Pierre Joye wrote:
There is no link from windows.php.net web sites to 5.2. They only
remain in the downloads section, if accessed directly.
I think it's the presence of 5.2 on the download page that is being talked
about? While I still have reason to use 5.2, I'd support dropping this ti the
Currently the downloads page on http://php.net/ only lists the supported
versions(5.3, 5.4, 5.5) and I think that http://windows.php.net/ should
be
synced with that, so the 5.2 links should be removed.
http://museum.php.net/ already has those binaries, so it would be still
available for
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently the downloads page on http://php.net/ only lists the
supported
versions(5.3, 5.4, 5.5) and I think that http://windows.php.net/should
be
synced with that, so the 5.2 links should be removed.
done, was sure it was done since long already.
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Julien Pauli jpa...@php.net wrote:
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently the downloads page on http://php.net/ only lists the
supported
versions(5.3, 5.4, 5.5) and I
Pierre Joye wrote:
done, was sure it was done since long already.
Pierre ... I think that the 5.2 stuff was left as the only VC6 build. The notes
of the side bar refer still to using that when perhaps a 'no longer supported'
may be better?
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Pierre Joye wrote:
done, was sure it was done since long already.
Pierre ... I think that the 5.2 stuff was left as the only VC6 build. The
notes of the side bar refer still to using that when perhaps a 'no longer
Pierre Joye wrote:
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Pierre Joye wrote:
done, was sure it was done since long already.
Pierre ... I think that the 5.2 stuff was left as the only VC6 build. The
notes of the side bar refer still to using that when perhaps
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Pierre ... all I am saying is that the reference to 'older VC6 versions' in
the left hand column would benefit from a 'which are only available in the
museum', although I would suggest it may be better simply to say 'no
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 1:05 AM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Pierre Joye wrote:
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Pierre ... all I am saying is that the reference to 'older VC6 versions'
in
the left hand column would benefit from a 'which are
It is approaching 2 1/2 years since the last release of PHP 5.2. 5.2
has been declared dead on more than one occasion around here. The dust
has more or less settled since PHP 5.3 EOL was announced. The ONLY
reason I still support 5.2 in my own userland software is because the
5.2 binaries
12 matches
Mail list logo
