Hi,
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 19:12 +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
My goal will be to provides both solutions (libmysql and mysqlnd) to be
able to quickly switch from one to the other (for tests / benchmark)
Like others said I'd go with different static builds - it's not like PHP
would take ages to
Hi,
Building 5.3.1 snapshot with options
--with-mysql=shared,mysqlnd
--with-mysqli=shared,mysqlnd
--with-pdo-mysql=shared,mysqlnd
create 3 .so files, ok.
But mysqlnd extension still build as static within php core.
Is it a way to build mysqlnd as a shared extension ?
Don't
On 08/17/2009 08:12 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
Hi,
Building 5.3.1 snapshot with options
--with-mysql=shared,mysqlnd
--with-mysqli=shared,mysqlnd
--with-pdo-mysql=shared,mysqlnd
create 3 .so files, ok.
But mysqlnd extension still build as static within php core.
It's not an
Remi Collet schrieb:
My goal will be to provides both solutions (libmysql and mysqlnd) to be
able to quickly switch from one to the other (for tests / benchmark)
Any idea / solution ?
Andrey might have. CC'ing him.
P.S. main question is probably, should we use mysqlnd under linux ?
Well, if you're doing speed comparisons why not just compile both
mysqlnd and mysql(i) as static? ;-)
On 8/18/09, Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com wrote:
Hi,
Building 5.3.1 snapshot with options
--with-mysql=shared,mysqlnd
--with-mysqli=shared,mysqlnd
