[mailto:guilhermebla...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 10:35 PM
To: Will Fitch
Cc: Clint M Priest; Pierre Joye; internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Accessors v2 Patch
hi Will,
That's what I've been thinking about.
I have a special necessity to overload a class in a Proxy
@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Accessors v2 Patch
oh right, I missed them. Yes, so it is covered as well :)
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:42 AM, Clint M Priest cpri...@zerocue.com wrote:
There are already two tests against private read and private write, should
I add two for protected as well
less details to
make sense.
johannes
-Original Message-
From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 6:47 PM
To: Clint M Priest
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Accessors v2 Patch
oh right, I missed them. Yes, so it is covered
: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Accessors v2 Patch
oh right, I missed them. Yes, so it is covered as well :)
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:42 AM, Clint M Priest cpri...@zerocue.com wrote:
There are already two tests against private read and private write, should
I add two
Much better implementation.
As for the failed tests, I would double check and make sure you don't
have any stray debug statements (e.g. printf).
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 11, 2011, at 2:27 PM, Clint M Priest cpri...@zerocue.com wrote:
PM
To: Clint M Priest
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Accessors v2 Patch
Much better implementation.
As for the failed tests, I would double check and make sure you don't have any
stray debug statements (e.g. printf).
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 11, 2011, at 2:27 PM, Clint M
[mailto:will.fi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 1:41 PM
To: Clint M Priest
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Accessors v2 Patch
Much better implementation.
As for the failed tests, I would double check and make sure you don't have
any stray debug statements (e.g. printf
: Will Fitch [mailto:will.fi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 1:41 PM
To: Clint M Priest
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Accessors v2 Patch
Much better implementation.
As for the failed tests, I would double check and make sure you don't have
any stray debug
oh right, I missed them. Yes, so it is covered as well :)
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:42 AM, Clint M Priest cpri...@zerocue.com wrote:
There are already two tests against private read and private write, should I
add two for protected as well?
Cheers,
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye |
To: Clint M Priest
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Accessors v2 Patch
oh right, I missed them. Yes, so it is covered as well :)
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:42 AM, Clint M Priest cpri...@zerocue.com wrote:
There are already two tests against private read and private write, should I
[mailto:pierre@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 6:47 PM
To: Clint M Priest
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Accessors v2 Patch
oh right, I missed them. Yes, so it is covered as well :)
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:42 AM, Clint M Priest cpri...@zerocue.com wrote
()
Comments?
-Original Message-
From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 6:47 PM
To: Clint M Priest
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Accessors v2 Patch
oh right, I missed them. Yes, so it is covered as well :)
On Mon, Dec 12
]
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 6:47 PM
To: Clint M Priest
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Accessors v2 Patch
oh right, I missed them. Yes, so it is covered as well :)
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:42 AM, Clint M Priest cpri...@zerocue.com wrote:
There are already two tests
13 matches
Mail list logo
