On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Jani Taskinen wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Marc Boeren wrote:
>
> >
> > Hiyall and Wez in particular,
> >
> > > In general, unless the extension is a really ancient forgotten thing,
> > > the person moving it should coordinate with the current maintainer to
> > > set that up.
Hiyall,
> > So what is needed to get it on the pecl site in the packages list?
>
> 1) It needs to become registered as a package:
> http://pecl.php.net/package-new.php
>
> 2) In order to be downloadable it needs a release:
> http://pecl.php.net/release-upload.php
>
> For all of these steps you
Marc Boeren wrote:
So what is needed to get it on the pecl site in the packages list?
1) It needs to become registered as a package:
http://pecl.php.net/package-new.php
2) In order to be downloadable it needs a release:
http://pecl.php.net/release-upload.php
For all of these steps you need t
Hiyall,
> Please note this: This was only removed from PHP 5.1-dev (HEAD),
> it still exists in the PHP_4_4 branch.. And AFAIK, there are no
> releases of PHP 5.1 (other than betas) out yet? :)
Still, some work needs to be done to make the transition to pecl
smoother, such as gett
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Marc Boeren wrote:
Hiyall and Wez in particular,
In general, unless the extension is a really ancient forgotten thing,
the person moving it should coordinate with the current maintainer to
set that up.
That would have been nice :-)
Please note this: This was only r
Hiyall and Wez in particular,
> In general, unless the extension is a really ancient forgotten thing,
> the person moving it should coordinate with the current maintainer to
> set that up.
That would have been nice :-)
> Would you mind creating the appropriate package.xml file and tarball
> and
In general, unless the extension is a really ancient forgotten thing,
the person moving it should coordinate with the current maintainer to
set that up.
Would you mind creating the appropriate package.xml file and tarball
and releasing dbx via PECL, Marc?
Let me know if you need an account for th
