> On Jun 17, 2019, at 12:50, Mark Randall wrote:
>
> On 17/06/2019 15:40, Ben Ramsey wrote:
>>> Where "use (...)" would auto-capture all of the used variables in a similar
>>> manner to short closures, that would certainly save a bit of time.
>
>> Would this mean that all variables in the
On 17/06/2019 15:40, Ben Ramsey wrote:
Where "use (...)" would auto-capture all of the used variables in a similar
manner to short closures, that would certainly save a bit of time.
Would this mean that all variables in the “parent" are now available in the
“child?” This seems like it could
On Sat, 15 Jun 2019 at 23:22, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
> The proposed syntax was also that of the proposed syntax when closures
> arrived in 5.3 (and back then it was using the then keyword
> 'lexical'), anyway. I believe the current syntax was chosen due to
> scopes, as values are bound
> On Jun 16, 2019, at 07:04, Mark Randall wrote:
>
> On 15/06/2019 22:53, Wes wrote:
>> Hello PHP, I just published
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/alternative-closure-use-syntax
>> I would love your opinion on this
>
> I'm not overly fond of it myself because I think it could make it slightly
>
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 3:02 AM M. W. Moe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> if you are upset; it's not the place here; your argument is efficiently
> based on problems of indentation and handling commas
> properly.
>
> Moreover, but not least, you have no idea what a lambda is; if we admit it
> what you
>
> ""M. W. Moe"" wrote
> > If you do not accept any rational criticism; you should think of doing
> > something else; I do not know; gardening maybe? who knows.
> >
> > P.S For my use of the "closure" you made a fool yourself beyond what you
> > can grasp; but anyhow, my dear, it's refreshing,
""M. W. Moe"" wrote in message
news:CAHN63oOGX1E8n2_N7-m=vhytf7kxccpvlw3lokrotnzuzz-...@mail.gmail.com...
> If you do not accept any rational criticism; you should think of doing
> something else; I do not know; gardening maybe? who knows.
>
> P.S For my use of the "closure" you made a fool
Hi,
On 15.06.19 23:53, Wes wrote:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/alternative-closure-use-syntax
Thanks for the RFC and effort,
I know it seems overkill and wrong to have two different syntaxes for the
same thing, but I really believe that's all we need to fix one of the most
hated PHP syntax
Hi Alexandru,
I don't think there is intention to do that. In particular with pass by
reference. Importing variables by-ref likely will be explicit, given recent
discussions on the matter.
The new Closures or the old ones might automatically "copy" all variables
(by-value) at some point, but I
On 15/06/2019 22:53, Wes wrote:
Hello PHP, I just published
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/alternative-closure-use-syntax
I would love your opinion on this
I'm not overly fond of it myself because I think it could make it
slightly more difficult to parse in my brain.
If there was a:
$x = 0;
$y =
Hi,
If at some point we would have multi-statement body arrow function, I would
assume that one option would be to have the closure done automatically, as
it is done now on the one-line arrow function.
If the values will not be implicitly captured, maybe a new syntax to
capture can be designed
Hello,
if you are upset; it's not the place here; your argument is efficiently
based on problems of indentation and handling commas
properly.
Moreover, but not least, you have no idea what a lambda is; if we admit it
what you propose; that is not feasible in PHP; why? because it would
require a
Den søn. 16. jun. 2019 kl. 02.48 skrev Wes :
>
> Hi Kalle. I hope it's feasible. Unfortunately I don't know much about
> internals. Any info on the matter would be very appreciated, though :P
>
> Anyway, if we can scan the function body to complain about `return null;`
> when the function is
Hi Kalle. I hope it's feasible. Unfortunately I don't know much about
internals. Any info on the matter would be very appreciated, though :P
Anyway, if we can scan the function body to complain about `return null;`
when the function is `:void`, surely we can scan just the very top of the
function
Welcome to the first inevitable patronizing message... No, my code is not
smelly. If something is smelling for you, check your armpits.
Importing 4 variables is not rare. If you think it's rare and should be
done differently, maybe you should first actually do something with
Closures before
Hello,
mostly, your argument in your rfc, is all about not finding a good syntax;
hence your have a terrible coding style
and you want to change the language for that.
```
$fn = function (
T1 $arg1_
, T1 $arg2_
, T1 $arg3_
, T1 $arg4_
, T1 $arg5_
, T1 $arg6_
) use ($var1, &$var2, &$var3,
Hi
Den søn. 16. jun. 2019 kl. 01.37 skrev Wes :
>
> Hi Kalle, I realize it's going to be a bit odd when binding by value. But
> it's not that hard to grasp.
>
> ```
> $a = 123;
> $closure = function(){
> use $a;
> echo $a; // 123
> };
> $a = 345;
> ```
Take this example:
function
Hi Kalle, I realize it's going to be a bit odd when binding by value. But
it's not that hard to grasp.
```
$a = 123;
$closure = function(){
use $a;
echo $a; // 123
};
$a = 345;
```
For this reason I specified it is mandatory to have `use` only at the very
top (otherwise, it would
Den søn. 16. jun. 2019 kl. 01.09 skrev Wes :
>
> Declaring variables or specifying which ones to import. Essentially it's
> the same thing, so what gives? It's PHP's syntax, IMHO, that makes the
> thing irritating to write :D
The proposed syntax was also that of the proposed syntax when closures
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019, 00:09 Wes wrote:
> Declaring variables or specifying which ones to import. Essentially it's
> the same thing, so what gives? It's PHP's syntax, IMHO, that makes the
> thing irritating to write :D
>
Just more AST to process, if you ask me
>
Declaring variables or specifying which ones to import. Essentially it's
the same thing, so what gives? It's PHP's syntax, IMHO, that makes the
thing irritating to write :D
On Sat, 15 Jun 2019 at 23:57, Marco Pivetta wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2019, 23:53 Wes wrote:
>
> > Hello PHP, I just published
> >
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/alternative-closure-use-syntax
> >
> > I would love your opinion on this
> >
> > I know it seems overkill and wrong to have two
Hey Wes,
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019, 23:53 Wes wrote:
> Hello PHP, I just published
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/alternative-closure-use-syntax
>
> I would love your opinion on this
>
> I know it seems overkill and wrong to have two different syntaxes for the
> same thing, but I really believe that's
23 matches
Mail list logo
