On Mar 18, 2015 6:42 PM, Patrick ALLAERT patrickalla...@php.net wrote:
Le lun. 16 mars 2015 à 21:34, Matthew Leverton lever...@gmail.com a
écrit :
(Although the irony of using =1 instead of =true isn't lost on me!)
Yes, I mentioned[1] that funny aspect earlier.
0 or 1 is explicitly
Le lun. 16 mars 2015 à 21:34, Matthew Leverton lever...@gmail.com a
écrit :
(Although the irony of using =1 instead of =true isn't lost on me!)
Yes, I mentioned[1] that funny aspect earlier.
0 or 1 is explicitly required in order to update the boolean behind it
while true/false generates a
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
Hi all,
I think this is important, but not many people realize the importance.
Therefore I created this as a new thread at the last minutes of vote.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Dennis Birkholz den...@birkholz.biz
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
Hi all,
I think this is important, but not many people realize the importance.
Therefore I created this as a new thread at the last minutes of vote.
...
strict_mode is just controlling errors, then it should be named as
Hi Matthew and all,
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:34 AM, Matthew Leverton lever...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
Hi all,
I think this is important, but not many people realize the importance.
Therefore I created this as a new thread
