On Sat, May 30, 2020, 18:20 tyson andre wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
> > The naming is extremely wonky: allow_cache to allow_optimization? 樂
> > Nonetheless, this is extremely valuable for widely used binaries and
> long running processes, so
>
> I'm not fully clear on what you mean for
Hi Marco,
> The naming is extremely wonky: allow_cache to allow_optimization? 樂
> Nonetheless, this is extremely valuable for widely used binaries and long
> running processes, so
I'm not fully clear on what you mean for opcache.allow_optimization to do -
you'd have to combine it with
Hey Tyson,
The naming is extremely wonky: allow_cache to allow_optimization? 樂
Nonetheless, this is extremely valuable for widely used binaries and long
running processes, so
On Sat, May 30, 2020, 17:55 tyson andre wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> I have opened the voting for
