> I think in the long run it tends to be a bit ugly, but I don't see any
> alternative right now, because merging the CVS histories doesn't seem to be
> feasible to me. So I'm OK with it for now.
With the empty branch concept, the unused engine directory
contains only a single anti-pruning
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 07:28:40AM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote :
> However, I am not convinced that having to explicitly checkout the PHP_5
> branch is such a good idea. I thought the idea was to have HEAD be the
> current development version and branch if off when necessary. I would
> prefer thi
At 05:25 AM 6/24/2003 +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote:
So, we should get comfortable with the idea of having a Zend
_and_ a ZendEngine2 dir at the same time(*).
Thoughts?
I think in the long run it tends to be a bit ugly, but I don't see any
alternative right now, because merging the CVS
