Just a little addition:
implicit_flush=on:
php_body_write_wrapper()
- php_ub_body_write_no_header()
- php_apache_sapi_ub_write()
- php_apache_sapi_flush()
implicit_flush=off:
php_body_write_wrapper()
- php_ub_body_write_no_header()
- php_apache_sapi_ub_write()
As long as
"Ilia A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On March 25, 2003 04:43 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > resend due to 30k issue.
> >
> > > Attached is the patch (ap2.txt) that prevents AP2 handler from constantly
> > > flushing the data as soon as it is passed. As you can see in the
> > > benchmarks this
On March 25, 2003 04:43 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> resend due to 30k issue.
>
> > Attached is the patch (ap2.txt) that prevents AP2 handler from constantly
> > flushing the data as soon as it is passed. As you can see in the
> > benchmarks this more the doubles the performance when many writes
ED]
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Preliminary Apache 2 benchmarks
>
>
> On March 25, 2003 04:43 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > resend due to 30k issue.
> >
> > > Attached is the patch (ap2.txt) that prevents AP2 handler
> from constantly
> > > flushing the d
resend due to 30k issue.
Attached is the patch (ap2.txt) that prevents AP2 handler from constantly
flushing the data as soon as it is passed. As you can see in the benchmarks
this more the doubles the performance when many writes occur. I am hoping Ian
can explain the need for this flush, sinc
On March 25, 2003 11:31 am, Ian Holsman wrote:
> also.. while I've got your guys attention.. there are a lot of bugs
> coming up about using a threaded version of apache2 hanging on startup
> with cvs-head... I thought this was working ok on 4.3.1.. any idea on
> what might have changed in TSRM ?
After further reviews I determined that 1000 request is too small and is often
affected by external factors far too much and tends to fluctuate wildly.
Therefor I've made a new set of tests based on 5 run of 10,000 request each
for every SAPI. The tests were ran at a 10 second interval with a 2
Hi Guys.
just a couple of questions about the test.
1. was the code-base exactly the same except for the sapi handler (ie..
your not comparing 4.3.1 against cvs-head) I'm assuming this is true
2. how many machines were you using to run your test. if you were
running the test from the same mach
What are the numbers for Apache 1.3 for the same tests?
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Ilia A. wrote:
> Based on bug #22815, which talks about unsatisfactory performance of the
> apache 2 sapi, I've decided to conduct several benchmarks to determine the
> depth of the problem.
>
> Based on my tests (ran us
