On Nov 16, 2003, at 7:53 PM, Christian Schneider wrote:
To achieve your goal I suggest someone builds benchmarking into the
regression tests, i.e. 'make benchmark-tests' or the like, outputting
a machine readable format. It would then be possible to automatically
compare two versions on a much w
On Nov 16, 2003, at 7:44 PM, Christian Schneider wrote:
Mike Robinson wrote:
The benchmark provides insight into changes in PHP speed between
versions, major and minor. IMHO that's useful information, nice
It tackles very little of PHP. One of the main changes of PHP5 (object
references vs. copyi
George Schlossnagle wrote:
I think you miss the point. Comprehesive benchmarks are nice so that
you can evaluate the effects of and prevent performance accidents often
associated withnew changes. It's not groundbreaking stuff, but it's
I'm just not convinced that these little microbenchmarks a
On Nov 16, 2003, at 5:57 PM, Christian Schneider wrote:
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/PHP_Benchmark/
Any comments, feedback, corrections and additions are welcome,
You've done a good job but we basically only see two things:
a) PHP4 is an order of a magniture fas
Mike Robinson wrote:
The benchmark provides insight into changes in PHP speed between
versions, major and minor. IMHO that's useful information, nice
It tackles very little of PHP. One of the main changes of PHP5 (object
references vs. copying) is missing for example. Of course it could be
extend
Christian Schneider wrote:
> Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> > http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/PHP_Benchmark/
> > Any comments, feedback, corrections and additions are welcome,
>
> You've done a good job but we basically only see two things:
> a) PHP4 is an order of a magniture faster than PHP