Re: [PHP-DEV] Unmaintained SAPIs

2011-04-28 Thread Julien Pauli
All right ;-) Johannes: Thanks for details about lighhtpd's internals. Julien.P 2011/4/27 Johannes Schlüter > On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 15:36 +0200, Julien Pauli wrote: > > I'm +1 with that list. > > > > I'd like to have some time to work on a lighttpd sapi if possible > > (haven't seen lighttpd A

Re: [PHP-DEV] Unmaintained SAPIs

2011-04-27 Thread Johannes Schlüter
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 15:36 +0200, Julien Pauli wrote: > I'm +1 with that list. > > I'd like to have some time to work on a lighttpd sapi if possible > (haven't seen lighttpd API yet). If someone got the same idea, just > tell it... lighty's API for that is FastCGI. There is an native API, but pl

Re: [PHP-DEV] Unmaintained SAPIs

2011-04-27 Thread Julien Pauli
I'm +1 with that list. I'd like to have some time to work on a lighttpd sapi if possible (haven't seen lighttpd API yet). If someone got the same idea, just tell it... What about apache2filter SAPI ? Julien.P 2011/4/24 Pierre Joye > 2011/4/24 Rasmus Lerdorf : > > On 4/24/11 4:41 AM, Pierre Jo

Re: [PHP-DEV] Unmaintained SAPIs

2011-04-24 Thread Pierre Joye
2011/4/24 Rasmus Lerdorf : > On 4/24/11 4:41 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: >> >> hi, >> >> Do we really need apache 1.x SAPIs? >> >> ISAPI should be kept in (was decided so by the 5.3.0 release time), it >> is still used and works for users with custom versions. A new version >> may come as well, as part

Re: [PHP-DEV] Unmaintained SAPIs

2011-04-24 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
On 4/24/11 4:41 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: hi, Do we really need apache 1.x SAPIs? ISAPI should be kept in (was decided so by the 5.3.0 release time), it is still used and works for users with custom versions. A new version may come as well, as part of one of some features I'm working on. Your ar

Re: [PHP-DEV] Unmaintained SAPIs

2011-04-24 Thread Pierre Joye
hi, Do we really need apache 1.x SAPIs? ISAPI should be kept in (was decided so by the 5.3.0 release time), it is still used and works for users with custom versions. A new version may come as well, as part of one of some features I'm working on. 2011/4/23 Johannes Schlüter : > Hi, > > we have q

Re: [PHP-DEV] Unmaintained SAPIs

2011-04-23 Thread Sanford Whiteman
> isapi (is FastCGI now preferred on Win?) Pls don't remove ISAPI, as it still workswindofor 5.3 even if deprecated. We still use it as part of third-party x64 Windows builds. -- Sandy -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/un

RE: [PHP-DEV] Unmaintained SAPIs

2011-04-23 Thread Uwe Schindler
.net NSAPI SAPI developer Bremen, Germany > -Original Message- > From: Rasmus Lerdorf [mailto:ras...@lerdorf.com] > Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2011 1:49 AM > To: Johannes Schlüter > Cc: PHP internals list > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Unmaintained SAPIs > > On 4/22/1

Re: [PHP-DEV] Unmaintained SAPIs

2011-04-22 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
On 4/22/11 6:08 PM, Johannes Schlüter wrote: apache_hooks We can drop apache_hooks as well. I think I was the only one ever to use it. -Rasmus -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php