On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Derick Rethans wrote:
> Yes, and that's why I want 5.4 alpha1 out soonish...
s,want,would like to,
Even if you were the RM, that's not your call. Tired of seeing doing
the same thing again and again.
Cheers,
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | h
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> Am 10.08.2010 17:14, schrieb Derick Rethans:
>> I think our current way work pretty well. There is 5.2 which is
>> security-fix supported, 5.3 that is supported and trunk/5.4 that's on
>> the way to alpha.
>
> This only works if manage
2010/8/10 Derick Rethans
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 16:20 +0200, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> > > Is LTS really something we need to provide? Seems to me like this is
> > > something the linux vendors take care of for the most part. Of course
> > > t
Am 10.08.2010 17:25, schrieb Derick Rethans:
> Yes, and that's why I want 5.4 alpha1 out soonish...
Exactly.
--
Sebastian BergmannCo-Founder and Principal Consultant
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://thePHP.cc/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime De
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> Am 10.08.2010 17:14, schrieb Derick Rethans:
> > I think our current way work pretty well. There is 5.2 which is
> > security-fix supported, 5.3 that is supported and trunk/5.4 that's on
> > the way to alpha.
>
> This only works if manage to ke
On 10.08.2010, at 17:20, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> Am 10.08.2010 17:14, schrieb Derick Rethans:
>> I think our current way work pretty well. There is 5.2 which is
>> security-fix supported, 5.3 that is supported and trunk/5.4 that's on
>> the way to alpha.
>
> This only works if manage to k
Am 10.08.2010 17:14, schrieb Derick Rethans:
> I think our current way work pretty well. There is 5.2 which is
> security-fix supported, 5.3 that is supported and trunk/5.4 that's on
> the way to alpha.
This only works if manage to keep the time between "new code is
committed to trunk" and "n
