Hello,
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Chris Stockton
chrisstockto...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 8:32 PM, mm w 0xcafef...@gmail.com wrote:
cast is not needed in PHP
i 'd rather be more interesting in
class Obj {
function __catch($data, $type) {
It appears that, mm w is talking about some aspect oriented feature.
I would welcome a magic method that would intercept calls/access to
existing methods/properties (not only inaccessible ones), in the same
sense that __getattribute__ works in Python for example IIRC. It may
also be a good
Etienne Kneuss wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Chris Stockton
chrisstockto...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 8:32 PM, mm w 0xcafef...@gmail.com wrote:
cast is not needed in PHP
i 'd rather be more interesting in
class Obj {
function __catch($data,
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 8:32 PM, mm w 0xcafef...@gmail.com wrote:
cast is not needed in PHP
i 'd rather be more interesting in
class Obj {
function __catch($data, $type) {
//$type [ static_method, method, get_property, set_property]
if (observed $type ==
don't worry it's only for people who are working with MVC and
RootObject structure, there is too much magics already and __cast is
not needed at all,
as we cannot monkey patch to add an observer on itself, a nice
solution should have a catchable object so __catch any calls
function __catch($data,
How does this have *anything* to do with the discussion at hand?
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:09 PM, mm w 0xcafef...@gmail.com wrote:
don't worry it's only for people who are working with MVC and
RootObject structure, there is too much magics already and __cast is
not needed at all,
as we cannot
the multiplication of magic, the pointed point, need to read more carefully
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Eddie Drapkin oorza...@gmail.com wrote:
How does this have *anything* to do with the discussion at hand?
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:09 PM, mm w 0xcafef...@gmail.com wrote:
don't worry
What you're proposing is just forcing __call, _callStatic, __get and
__set into a single method, which does nothing to reduce the amount of
magic, only obfuscate it. And it certainly offers no alternative to
__cast, at least not that I can see.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:11 PM, mm w
I am not forcing anything, it's already there, that's definitely a
more useful magic, if people would add a new one, __cast is not
critical, catchable objects are __catch even if exists, so my point I
'd rather see useful requests than a unseful one e.g __cast
from my perspective __toString and
Eddie Drapkin wrote:
What you're proposing is just forcing __call, _callStatic, __get and
__set into a single method, which does nothing to reduce the amount of
magic, only obfuscate it. And it certainly offers no alternative to
__cast, at least not that I can see.
I agree, moving all magic
I don't move any magics,I am worried about your knowledge of php,
there's people to give you money ? weird, set get call are only call
when something doesn't exist catch or catch-able concept is to be able
to catch any existing calls no the dynamic ones.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Clint
I don't move any magics, I'm worried your knowledge of social skills? Theirs
people be your friends? Weird
On Jan 12, 2010 9:10 PM, mm w 0xcafef...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't move any magics,I am worried about your knowledge of php,
there's people to give you money ? weird, set get call are only
:-D, without any magic, I am sorry if I hurt you I though you were
tougher than a cookie, don't worry about my friends I have plenty on
face-cooked, but for God Sake I am still eating alone at noon 8-)
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Chris Stockton
chrisstockto...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Clint Priest cpri...@warpmail.net wrote:
I know there's been requests to add a __toArray() and most of the arguments
against it is that there are too many magic functions already. I just
thought I'd propose an alternative that would satisfy all of them.
Hi!
Why not a __cast($Type) magic function?
The interesting thing is that in the engine the object handler is actually:
typedef int (*zend_object_cast_t)(zval *readobj, zval *retval, int type
TSRMLS_DC);
i.e. the handler is already generic, but implementation API isn't -
standard engine
Etienne Kneuss wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Clint Priest cpri...@warpmail.net wrote:
I know there's been requests to add a __toArray() and most of the arguments
against it is that there are too many magic functions already. I just
thought I'd propose an alternative that
cast is not needed in PHP
i 'd rather be more interesting in
class Obj {
function __catch($data, $type) {
//$type [ static_method, method, get_property, set_property]
if (observed $type == set_property somevalueIsObserved) {
17 matches
Mail list logo
