> There are already a number of optimizations in array_merge. It might
depend on the actual test data that you used. Maybe a specific path needs
to be optimized. Please provide some more details.
You are right. I do not know how I tested before, but actually,
array_merge() is bit faster than array
Hi David,
It would be useful if you could provide your measurements and the way you
arrived at such results. A quick test doesn't seem to support your
findings: https://3v4l.org/v5m9f#v8.1.8
There are already a number of optimizations in array_merge. It might depend
on the actual test data that y
