On 22 Jul 2014, at 23:43, Marc Bennewitz wrote:
> You have added the new type internally only. Does it make sense or would
> it be possible to use one more internal type like "ULONG" to safe
> mem/cpu in such cases because bigint/GMP objects are used only on much
> higher numbers?
You *could* d
Hi Andrea,
very nice RFC!
You have added the new type internally only. Does it make sense or would
it be possible to use one more internal type like "ULONG" to safe
mem/cpu in such cases because bigint/GMP objects are used only on much
higher numbers?
Marc
On 23.07.2014 00:12, Andrea Faulds wro
I mean a new scalar type here
On 22.07.2014 22:33, Nikita Popov wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Marc Bennewitz
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I like to create an RFC to add an unsigned integer type for the
>> following purposes:
>>
>> - higher max value
>> - DBs already allow UNSIGNED I
