On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 20:46:38 +0200 (EET)
Jani Taskinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It still tries to eat memory =(
Was there some script to go with this..?
? phpinfo(); ?
or
? echo 1; ?
it doesn't matter, cause it seems to be happening on the stage of parsing ENV or
SERVER variables.
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 19:51:59 +0100
Sebastian Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jani Taskinen wrote:
Was there some script to go with this..?
Maybe this is related to the problem with PHP's logos I posted earlier?
I suppose no.
'cause this problem appears with _any_ script.
---
WBR,
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Antony Dovgal wrote:
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 19:51:59 +0100
Sebastian Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jani Taskinen wrote:
Was there some script to go with this..?
Maybe this is related to the problem with PHP's logos I posted earlier?
I suppose no.
'cause this problem
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 09:10:49 +0200 (EET)
Jani Taskinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Antony Dovgal wrote:
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 19:51:59 +0100
Sebastian Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jani Taskinen wrote:
Was there some script to go with this..?
Maybe this is
For the next 18-24 months, we are going to have to deal with code
running in both PHP 4 and 5. Why not declare var an alias for
public, not throw E_STRICT for it and be done with it? If not this
issue will be a real PITA for PEAR users.
- Stig
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 00:10, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I reverted this. We usually discuss changes like these before committing.
(on [EMAIL PROTECTED] so people not on IRC will know too)
Some reason why not do this like you did:
1) It doesn't work with windows
2) What if I have local changes and want to run ./cvsclean
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 20:56:53 +0200 (EET)
Jani Taskinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Antony Dovgal wrote:
BTW, I've already asked about this message:
buildconf: autoconf version 2.50 (ok)
buildconf: Your version of autoconf likely contains buggy cache code.
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
On Monday 01 December 2003 23:27, Derick Rethans wrote:
I don't quite understand the problem. E_STRICT was only meant for people
who really want to be pedantic. I think we can make it not part of E_ALL.
Is that OK?
SOunds good to me, -Wall
This is the simple test script:
?php
while (1) {
echo 1;
sleep (1);
}
?
Steps to reproduce:
1) Start Apache
2) Access the script and let it run for some seconds
3) Stop the request.
4) Shutdown Apache
Maybe these leaks are
AK but this is a whole world clearer...
AK
AK foreach($s-person-children as $person) {
AK $firstname_text_value = $person-firstname-value;
AK }
I agree 100%. It looks cool if yo do $a = $b and behind the scenes it
launches whole train of magic and runs a lot of code, but it's not that
On Tuesday 02 December 2003 09:18, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
On Monday 01 December 2003 23:27, Derick Rethans wrote:
I don't quite understand the problem. E_STRICT was only meant for
people who really want to be pedantic. I think we can make it not
Stig S. Bakken wrote:
For the next 18-24 months, we are going to have to deal with code
running in both PHP 4 and 5. Why not declare var an alias for
public, not throw E_STRICT for it and be done with it? If not this
issue will be a real PITA for PEAR users.
+1 from me (not that my vote counts,
At 11:40 PM 12/1/2003 +0100, Stig S. Bakken wrote:
For the next 18-24 months, we are going to have to deal with code
running in both PHP 4 and 5. Why not declare var an alias for
public, not throw E_STRICT for it and be done with it? If not this
issue will be a real PITA for PEAR users.
Stig,
I think there are quite a few Win98 users and I see no reason to dump it,
especially as it supports the system calls we need.
At 11:34 PM 12/1/2003 +, Steph wrote:
Can anyone explain to me why we're not dumping support for win98 at the same
time pls?
(Given that the PHP5 build system doesn't
At 11:42 PM 12/1/2003 +, Steph wrote:
Because win98 supports the functions we want to use (while win95
does not).
And the build system has nothing to do with the runtime support :)
Agreed, but sooner or later it will.. Andi, why (specifically) did Zend
drop win98 support?
We haven't
Andi Gutmans wrote:
E_STRICT will be disabled by default. It is only meant for people who
want to be sure that they are using the recommended methods, and that
definitely includes not using var.
The problem is that it doesn't match the real world. People _are_ using
PEAR and people _are_ using
I commited a fix. I am not quite sure why the existing code was doing what
it was so I'm waiting for Zeev (who wrote that part) to verify that my fix
is OK. (He's travelling right now so it'll take some time).
In the meanwhile, if any of your scripts break because of my fix please let
me know.
Hello Melvyn,
Tuesday, December 2, 2003, 10:53:17 AM, you wrote:
On Tuesday 02 December 2003 09:18, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
On Monday 01 December 2003 23:27, Derick Rethans wrote:
I don't quite understand the problem. E_STRICT was only meant for
So what's the verdict? Are we dumping Windows 95?
Andi
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
I'd like to convert the reflection API to the current php standard of
CamelCaps (instead of underscores) for it's class and method names.
Any objections?
George
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Based on the comments on the cvs list I think this would be a good idea.
+1
Ilia
On December 2, 2003 12:51 pm, Andi Gutmans wrote:
So what's the verdict? Are we dumping Windows 95?
Andi
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit:
Yep :)
- Original Message -
From: Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 5:51 PM
Subject: [PHP-DEV] Windows 95
So what's the verdict? Are we dumping Windows 95?
Andi
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To
Hello Stanislav,
Tuesday, December 2, 2003, 10:01:40 AM, you wrote:
AK but this is a whole world clearer...
AK
AK foreach($s-person-children as $person) {
AK $firstname_text_value = $person-firstname-value;
AK }
I agree 100%. It looks cool if yo do $a = $b and behind the scenes it
Hello George,
Tuesday, December 2, 2003, 6:58:58 PM, you wrote:
I'd like to convert the reflection API to the current php standard of
CamelCaps (instead of underscores) for it's class and method names.
Any objections?
No objections. Strong agreement.'
--
Best regards,
Marcus
Marcus Boerger wrote:
I see all your concerns. But from my point of view pear has (of course) the
problem that it is written in php4 and for php4. So PEAR needs to address
the move towards php5 code anyway. An optional E_STRICT would help here
wouldn't it?
[My concern is that if E_STRICT warns
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, George Schlossnagle wrote:
I'd like to convert the reflection API to the current php standard of
CamelCaps (instead of underscores) for it's class and method names.
Any objections?
yes
Derick
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit:
On Dec 2, 2003, at 1:18 PM, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, George Schlossnagle wrote:
I'd like to convert the reflection API to the current php standard of
CamelCaps (instead of underscores) for it's class and method names.
Any objections?
yes
Care to elaborate?
George
--
PHP
Again, people don't have to use E_STRICT. I think having two new E_'s is a
bit of an overkill especially as there aren't that many things we can add
to them.
At 07:18 PM 12/2/2003 +0100, Christian Schneider wrote:
Marcus Boerger wrote:
I see all your concerns. But from my point of view pear has
George Schlossnagle wrote:
I'd like to convert the reflection API to the current php standard of
CamelCaps (instead of underscores) for it's class and method names.
Why deviate from PEAR CS in this?
--
Sebastian Bergmann
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/
Yes.
- Frank
So what's the verdict? Are we dumping Windows 95?
Andi
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
Again, people don't have to use E_STRICT. I think having two new E_'s is
Why then introduce it at all? Or why not slightly change it to be useful
for a lot more people?
a bit of an overkill especially as there aren't that many things we
can add to them.
I think all of the
Hello Christian,
Tuesday, December 2, 2003, 7:18:11 PM, you wrote:
Marcus Boerger wrote:
I see all your concerns. But from my point of view pear has (of course) the
problem that it is written in php4 and for php4. So PEAR needs to address
the move towards php5 code anyway. An optional
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, George Schlossnagle wrote:
On Dec 2, 2003, at 1:22 PM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
George Schlossnagle wrote:
I'd like to convert the reflection API to the current php standard of
CamelCaps (instead of underscores) for it's class and method names.
Why deviate from
On Dec 2, 2003, at 1:51 PM, Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, George Schlossnagle wrote:
On Dec 2, 2003, at 1:22 PM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
George Schlossnagle wrote:
I'd like to convert the reflection API to the current php standard
of
CamelCaps (instead of underscores)
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, George Schlossnagle wrote:
On Dec 2, 2003, at 1:18 PM, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, George Schlossnagle wrote:
I'd like to convert the reflection API to the current php standard of
CamelCaps (instead of underscores) for it's class and method names.
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:
So what's the verdict? Are we dumping Windows?
YES! :)
--Jani
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hey Folks:
I'm looking for old snapshots of php5 win32 packages. From my browsing
around the tree, snaps.php.net only has the past few ones. Do they exist
somewhere, please?
This question hasn't been answered when asked in my bug report replies.
I'm trying to pinpoint when a particular bug
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Daniel Convissor wrote:
I'm looking for old snapshots of php5 win32 packages. From my browsing
around the tree, snaps.php.net only has the past few ones. Do they exist
somewhere, please?
No, we don't archive those. But you can do a cvs checkout with a certain
date:
cvs
I've got a fix for Bug #24773 ( http://bugs.php.net/24773 )
However, I've neither the confidence nor the karma to apply it.
Patches for ZE1 and ZE2:
http://frankenbox.alphaweb.net/test/24773-ze1.diff
http://frankenbox.alphaweb.net/test/24773-ze2.diff
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development
On 12/2/03 7:51 PM, Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, George Schlossnagle wrote:
On Dec 2, 2003, at 1:22 PM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
George Schlossnagle wrote:
I'd like to convert the reflection API to the current php standard of
CamelCaps (instead of underscores) for
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Christian Stocker wrote:
This raises my question of my the new Exception class uses CamelCaps instead
of underscores?
For instance, its methods are: getMessage(), getCode(), etc.
I don't think any other built-in method or packaged extension does this.
ext/dom and
I've committed the build infrastructure for the
real programmers don't need an IDE build system for win32.
Why?
- It's frustrating to have to use VC6 to work on PHP if you
have a newer version that has incompatible project files.
- It's annoying to mess around with libxml2 stuff until it
--disable-apache Works For Me (tm)
What goes wrong for you?
--Wez.
- Original Message -
From: Frank M. Kromann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Wez Furlong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:18 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] New win32 build system
Hi Wez,
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 11:40:18PM -, Wez Furlong wrote:
I've committed the build infrastructure for the
real programmers don't need an IDE build system for win32.
Neat. Could you add a README.WIN32-BUILD-SYSTEM file that contains
all of the information that you provided in this email?
Here is the output
C:\PHP\php5cscript /nologo configure.js --with-php-build=Release_TS
--disable-apache
Saving configure options to config.nice.bat
Checking for cl ... cl.exe
Checking for link ... link.exe
Checking for nmake ... nmake.exe
Checking for make ... not found
Build dir: Release_TS
Hi devs,
this night i saw that the BC of strrpos()/strripos()
is broken by a patch commited by pollita 7 months ago :
http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/php-src/ext/standard/string.c?login=2r1=1.370r2=1.371ty=u
The documenation of both function states if the second parameter is an
integer instead of
Ahh, fixed now :-)
--with-php-build specifies the path to the php_build dir
(the one that contains those headers and libs),
not the target dir, which is chosen automatically.
cscript /nologo configure.js --disable-apache
should be all you need (cross your fingers!)
--Wez.
- Original
Hi Wez,
If I don't specify --with-php-build I get this
Saving configure options to config.nice.bat
Checking for cl ... cl.exe
Checking for link ... link.exe
Checking for nmake ... nmake.exe
Checking for make ... not found
ERROR: Could not find the php_build dir; please specify it
using the
Hi Wez,
Why is that needed ? I build all the stuff that I need from sources so I
have my own file structure for external header and library files.
- Frank
--with-php-build should be the path to the dir where you
unzipped: http://www.php.net/extra/win32build.zip.
Maybe I should rename it
The main reason is that it is the easiest way to get things to
built right now; I do plan to accomodate your own layout,
but haven't coded support for that yet :)
I'll make this particular thing optional (but print a warning)
for now; can you build without it?
(I take it you have your preferred
The main reason is that it is the easiest way to get things to
built right now; I do plan to accomodate your own layout,
but haven't coded support for that yet :)
Ok. Thats fine. I'll be happy to help with this.
I'll make this particular thing optional (but print a warning)
for now; can
Sara Golemon wrote:
The documenation of both function states if the second parameter is an
integer instead of string then its value is used as a ord of the character
to be used during the search. This no more true with HEAD.
Good catch. This should not have been broken, I'll fix this.
Wez:
Your new compile routine -- which sounds nice, thanks -- seems to come
just in time for me...
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 11:40:18PM -, Wez Furlong wrote:
You also need the Microsoft build tools (cl.exe, link.exe and nmake.exe).
These are freely available as part of the Platform SDK,
From: Derick Rethans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 8:02 PM
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, George Schlossnagle wrote:
On Dec 2, 2003, at 1:18 PM, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, George Schlossnagle wrote:
I'd like to convert the reflection API to
What do you think? Is it ok to break the BC here or not? As you see the
other change introduced with the patch is to use the whole needle string
while searching, not only the first character.
That break was intentional. Having strrpos() behave differently from
strpos() in regards to needle
55 matches
Mail list logo
