On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 17:43:35 -0700
Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I mentioned about a week ago, I'd like to roll 5.0.1 (mainly due to
> the auth bug) and some other fixes.
> I was thinking of rolling this minor release tomorrow or Tuesday. If
> you have any bug fixes you'd like to ma
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004 00:20:08 +1000
Kevin Waterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, no. I am running apache 1.3.31 and php 5.1.0
>
> /php/dev/this/php5-200407310630/Zend/zend_constants.c(33) : Block
> 0x0087F563
> status:/php/dev/this/php5-200407310630/Zend/zend_variables.c(39) :
> Actual locatio
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> At 15:45 31/07/2004, Derick Rethans wrote:
> >Exceptions are an OO thing, and it makes NO sense to use them in
> >procedural code. Goto is a good thing here.
>
> Can you explain why it makes no sense to use them in procedural code?
heh? If you're writing
At 11:22 02/08/2004, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> At 15:45 31/07/2004, Derick Rethans wrote:
> >Exceptions are an OO thing, and it makes NO sense to use them in
> >procedural code. Goto is a good thing here.
>
> Can you explain why it makes no sense to use them in
I checked this last week; there are no people subscribed using that domain.
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004 23:10:56 -0400, Paul G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> folks,
>
> would someone with ml admin privs take a look and, if present, remove an
> @tgpwizards.com e-mail address subscription? the user has appar
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 09:00:21 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> PHP 4 Bug Database summary - http://bugs.php.net
5, Sir?
--Wez.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Sterling Hughes wrote:
> would be a good addition to xdebug, it couldn't be variable based, but
> it could be data based.
Yup, this is on my todo list.
Derick
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Joe Orton wrote:
> Building the bundled libgd library into PHP causes symbol namespace
> pollution; if any other Apache modules link a different version of libgd
> into the Apache process they may instead pick up symbols from the PHP
> libgd, and segfault randomly. (One of ou
Am Mo, den 02.08.2004 schrieb Wez Furlong um 10:38:
> On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 09:00:21 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > PHP 4 Bug Database summary - http://bugs.php.net
>
> 5, Sir?
>
PHP 5 is bug free! :)
/Georg
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http
Free bugs for all ! ;-)
--Wez.
On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 11:04:10 +0200, Georg Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Mo, den 02.08.2004 schrieb Wez Furlong um 10:38:
> > On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 09:00:21 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > PHP 4 Bug Database summary - http://bugs.php.net
> >
> > 5, Sir?
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, John Coggeshall wrote:
> attached
What does it do?
Derick
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Wez Furlong wrote:
> Free bugs for all ! ;-)
As opposed to free beer? I know what to choose then ;-)
Also, I just fixed this in php-bugs-web.
Derick
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi Mehdi,
Even Foo::HELLO works.
My question is why simple HELLO inside a member function does not work.
Why are we not able to access the static and const members of a class
from inside a class member function like the way with other member
variables.?
Any special reasons.
With regards
Kamesh J
Quoting Paul G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Andrey Hristov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Paul G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 4:18 AM
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] list abuse
>
>
> > Paul G wrote:
> > > folks,
> > >
> > La
Hi Steph,
My work is based on the work of Muhammad Hussain in hdate (Generate
Hijri dates, calendars and prayertimes using command line and X
interface, http://sourceforge.net/projects/hdate/ ).
for more information please read the file islamic_calendar.txt .
Thanks.
Steph wrote:
Hi Mostapha,
S
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
> Hi Mehdi,
> Even Foo::HELLO works.
> My question is why simple HELLO inside a member function does not work.
>
> Why are we not able to access the static and const members of a class
> from inside a class member function like the way with other memb
Hi Derick,
Thanks for the correction.
With regards
Kamesh Jayachandran
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 16:02:23 +0200 (CEST), "Derick Rethans"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
>
> > Hi Mehdi,
> > Even Foo::HELLO works.
> > My question is why simple HELLO inside a memb
Hi Derick,
Did you apply my patches?
With regards
Kamesh Jayachandran
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 21:29:47 +0200 (CEST), "Derick Rethans"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
>
> > Hi Derick,
> > Did you apply my patches?
>
> You'll have to wait until I get back f
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
> Hi Derick,
> Did you apply my patches?
Not yet, but I will. I just returned today.
Derick
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
- Original Message -
From: "Andrey Hristov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Paul G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 9:53 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] list abuse
--- snip ---
> Sure it does it intentionally. I have used to check the site without the
> pro
Antony Dovgal wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Aug 2004 00:20:08 +1000
> Kevin Waterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Well, no. I am running apache 1.3.31 and php 5.1.0
>>
>> /php/dev/this/php5-200407310630/Zend/zend_constants.c(33) : Block
>> 0x0087F563
>> status:/php/dev/this/php5-200407310630/Zend/zend_v
At 11:16 AM 8/2/2004 +0400, Antony Dovgal wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 17:43:35 -0700
Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I mentioned about a week ago, I'd like to roll 5.0.1 (mainly due to
> the auth bug) and some other fixes.
> I was thinking of rolling this minor release tomorrow or Tuesd
I get lots of "spam" from people on this list. It's just that spamers are
getting smarter and smarter and fake their emails well. Zeev sends lots of
Viagra to me :)
Andi
At 04:53 PM 8/2/2004 +0300, Andrey Hristov wrote:
Quoting Paul G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> - Original Message -
> From:
On Aug 2, 2004, at 2:25 PM, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I get lots of "spam" from people on this list. It's just that spamers
are getting smarter and smarter and fake their emails well. Zeev sends
lots of Viagra to me :)
You too? I thought he was trying to tell me something
George
--
PHP Internals -
- Original Message -
From: "Andi Gutmans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Andrey Hristov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Paul G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] list abuse
> Zeev sends lots of
> Viagra to me :)
too.. much... inf
SimpleXML returns attribute values as SimpleXMLElement objects instead
of strings. E.g, given this:
$sxe = simplexml_load_string('Doc
Ock');
$sxe['arms'] and $sxe['legs'] are SimpleXMLElement objects.
This mostly works OK, but causes problems when using empty() to test if
an attribute has a va
iterators...
On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 16:53:49 -0400, David Sklar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SimpleXML returns attribute values as SimpleXMLElement objects instead
> of strings. E.g, given this:
>
> $sxe = simplexml_load_string('Doc
> Ock');
>
> $sxe['arms'] and $sxe['legs'] are SimpleXMLElement ob
Ahh. Thanks.
David
Sterling Hughes wrote:
iterators...
On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 16:53:49 -0400, David Sklar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SimpleXML returns attribute values as SimpleXMLElement objects instead
of strings. E.g, given this:
$sxe = simplexml_load_string('Doc
Ock');
$sxe['arms'] and $sxe['legs'
What a stupid question I asked here... Nevermind.
Moriyoshi
On 2004/08/02, at 8:11, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
Hi,
The package includes a description how the test works. It basicly
consists of compiling PHP on your normal platform: f.e. OpenBSD
Apache2 CGI. You should just add --enable-memory-limit
> I just woke up but I think this can be solved with one do..while and using
> bitfield for example. so when you break, just check the bitfield what to
> clean up.
Indeed, but the original point was to make it easier to read.. Now, what
will make most sense to a newbie, this or the goto example th
> My opinion would be that goto isn't needed with the do..while()
> statement..
> But on the other hand.. Neither for(), while() or do..while() would be
> needed with goto, would they?
I learned a language called PHP. It contains for(), while() and
do..while(). I've been writing scripts that con
My point still remains.. Goto is powerful, even if not needed.. There's
about one time I would use goto, which could easily be done with two
do..while().. The funny thing is, that I didn't do it that way, cause I
though it looked ugly.
--
// DvDmanDT
MSN: dvdmandt¤hotmail.com
Mail: dvdmandt¤telia
Hello internals,
Not to take away from the wonderful and lively "GOTO" discussion,
but... I've got a couple simple questions.
1. Is there a particular reason that PHP does not have a really good
set of functions for dealing with true date and time types (i.e. not
timestamps)?
2. I t
On Aug 2, 2004, at 10:36 PM, Jason Garber wrote:
Hello internals,
Not to take away from the wonderful and lively "GOTO" discussion,
but... I've got a couple simple questions.
What's insufficient in strtotime() and strftime()?
George
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To un
http://pecl.php.net/package-info.php?package=Date
It's not in the core because it is still relatively young.
Maybe in a future release...
--Wez.
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 22:36:14 -0400, Jason Garber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello internals,
>
> Not to take away from the wonderful and lively "GO
> My point still remains.. Goto is powerful, even if not needed.. There's
> about one time I would use goto, which could easily be done with two
> do..while().. The funny thing is, that I didn't do it that way, cause I
> though it looked ugly.
And my point still remains. There are an awful lot of
> And my point still remains. There are an awful lot of PHP programmers out
> there who really don't need an extra way to write for(), or while(), or
> do..while(). It makes maintenance work harder when you have a mixture of
> styles in there to cope with.
>
> I don't for a moment believe that Sa
> My point was to say it's powerful, as powerful as all those, not that it
> could replace them.. I would still use while(), do..while() and for() the
> times they are intended for.. I'm sure most of the people would..
> There are
> however situations where goto is what makes sense..
I'm still wai
Hello Wez,
I must be missing something... I went to the link and couldn't find
any documentation. I downloaded it and all the .tgz contained were a
couple of .php scripts?
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Monday, August 2, 2004, 10:41:09 PM, you wrot
Hello George,
Because they both operate on an integer timestamp...
two things:
SELECT CURDATE() + INTERVAL 7 MONTH;
echo strtotime("7/12/1900");
Timestamps are fine for things that are happening within a very limited
range of dates. How do you add a given number of months to a d
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 23:08:17 -0400, Jason Garber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello George,
>
> Because they both operate on an integer timestamp...
>
> two things:
> SELECT CURDATE() + INTERVAL 7 MONTH;
> echo strtotime("7/12/1900");
>
> Timestamps are fine for things that are happe
i'm truying to write a ext for php, personal usage
in some case, my function modify the value and return
for performance issue, i'd like to use CopyOnWrite scheme for the case
returning without modify
but how?
_
The new MSN 8: smart
On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 23:08, Steph wrote:
> > My point was to say it's powerful, as powerful as all those, not that it
> > could replace them.. I would still use while(), do..while() and for() the
> > times they are intended for.. I'm sure most of the people would..
> > There are
> > however situat
Urgh, blame PEAR for that ;-)
There is a PECL date extension that you can obtain from our CVS
(see http://www.php.net/anoncvs.php):
cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/repository co pecl/date
cd pecl/date
phpize
./configure
make install
[ add date.so to php.ini ]
--Wez.
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 23:07:4
I always wished that PHP had VB's set of operators on dates/times... (and
also in SQL): year(), month(), date(), time_serial(), and the like. Yes, you
can do it with date("...", $x); but then it's just awkward to remember all
the operators.
Also, I'd always wished that PHP would have support for d
On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 13:36:22 -0300
Cristiano Duarte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Antony Dovgal wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 1 Aug 2004 00:20:08 +1000
> > Kevin Waterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Well, no. I am running apache 1.3.31 and php 5.1.0
> >>
> >> /php/dev/this/php5-200407310630/Zend/
On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 11:21:12 -0700
Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 11:16 AM 8/2/2004 +0400, Antony Dovgal wrote:
> >On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 17:43:35 -0700
> >Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > As I mentioned about a week ago, I'd like to roll 5.0.1 (mainly
> > > due to the
47 matches
Mail list logo
