Re: [PHP-DEV] Reference Notice

2005-07-18 Thread Lorenzo Alberton
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: Yes, we know there are still some issues here. People are working on it. Or there is at least intent to work on it. See http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=33643 actually this is the bug Robert was referring to: http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=33558 Regards, -- Lorenzo

Re: [PHP-DEV] Reference Notice

2005-07-18 Thread Derick Rethans
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Lorenzo Alberton wrote: Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: Yes, we know there are still some issues here. People are working on it. Or there is at least intent to work on it. See http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=33643 actually this is the bug Robert was referring to:

[PHP-DEV] PHP 4 Bug Summary Report

2005-07-18 Thread internals
PHP 4 Bug Database summary - http://bugs.php.net Num Status Summary (655 total including feature requests) ===[Adabas-D related]= 32486 Open odbc_fetch_into returns wrong data

[PHP-DEV] PHP 5 Bug Summary Report

2005-07-18 Thread internals
PHP 5 Bug Database summary - http://bugs.php.net Num Status Summary (344 total including feature requests) ===[*Compile Issues]== 33651 Feedback configure fails on -lreadline but real failure is -lpq

[PHP-DEV] [OCI8] Patch for bug #29779

2005-07-18 Thread BUSTARRET, Jean-Francois
I created a patch for http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=29779 (which can be considered as a feature request more than a bug). Rather than pinging existing connection each time, which would slow down things too much for high traffic sites, the patch pings connections only every x seconds.

Re: [PHP-DEV] [OCI8] Patch for bug #29779

2005-07-18 Thread Antony Dovgal
Hello Jean-Francois! On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 10:08:10 +0200 BUSTARRET, Jean-Francois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I created a patch for http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=29779 (which can be considered as a feature request more than a bug). Rather than pinging existing connection each time, which

RE: [PHP-DEV] [OCI8] Patch for bug #29779

2005-07-18 Thread BUSTARRET, Jean-Francois
Great ! Tell me if you want me to test the new oci extension. -Message d'origine- De : Antony Dovgal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : lundi 18 juillet 2005 10:20 À : BUSTARRET, Jean-Francois Cc : internals@lists.php.net Objet : Re: [PHP-DEV] [OCI8] Patch for bug #29779 Hello

[PHP-DEV] module startup problem in 5.1

2005-07-18 Thread Stanislav Malyshev
I see very serious problem un current module registration/startup functions in 5.1. In 5.0, there was a function zend_startup_module which did two things: 1. Register PHP module with the system 2. Run startup function of the module Now, in 5.1 those functions got spearated. However, the problem

[PHP-DEV] mail() into separate extension?

2005-07-18 Thread Piotr Roszatycki
Hi. I'd like to see mail() function in separate extension module. It would be possible to replace i.e. standard `extension=mail.so' with i.e. `extension=sendmail.so'. What do you think? Is it worth to prepare the patch? -- .''`.Piotr Roszatycki, Netia SA : :' :mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PHP-DEV] mail() into separate extension?

2005-07-18 Thread George Schlossnagle
Drop-in replacements are evil. If you want to do this, you should just create a new function that does what you need to do and name it differently. If you're dead-set on doing a name-based replacement, then you should have your extension modify the symbol table directly, but again, this

Re: [PHP-DEV] mail() into separate extension?

2005-07-18 Thread Andrew Yochum
On Jul 18, 2005, at 10:15 AM, George Schlossnagle wrote: Drop-in replacements are evil. If you want to do this, you should just create a new function that does what you need to do and name it differently. If you're dead-set on doing a name-based replacement, then you should have your

Re: [PHP-DEV] mail() into separate extension?

2005-07-18 Thread George Schlossnagle
On Jul 18, 2005, at 10:30 AM, Andrew Yochum wrote: On Jul 18, 2005, at 10:15 AM, George Schlossnagle wrote: Drop-in replacements are evil. If you want to do this, you should just create a new function that does what you need to do and name it differently. If you're dead-set on doing a

Re: [PHP-DEV] mail() into separate extension?

2005-07-18 Thread Piotr Roszatycki
On Monday 18 of July 2005 16:35, George Schlossnagle wrote: Sure. They inevitably will have differing behaviors (if not, why not just have a single unified function). Given that, you'll have different behaviors on different machines in a way that is not terribly transparent to end-users.

RE: [PHP-DEV] module startup problem in 5.1

2005-07-18 Thread Dmitry Stogov
Hi Stas, We can reimplement zend_register_internal_module() to return zend_module_entry* instead of bool. (The same behavior is in dl() function). Thanks. Dmitry. -Original Message- From: Stanislav Malyshev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 5:16 PM To: PHP

RE: [PHP-DEV] module startup problem in 5.1

2005-07-18 Thread Stanislav Malyshev
DSWe can reimplement zend_register_internal_module() to return DSzend_module_entry* instead of bool. Yes, I think it's the most simple way to do it. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/ +972-3-6139665 ext.115 -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime

RE: [PHP-DEV] module startup problem in 5.1

2005-07-18 Thread Dmitry Stogov
I'll do it. Dmitry. On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 18:04 +0300, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: DSWe can reimplement zend_register_internal_module() to return DSzend_module_entry* instead of bool. Yes, I think it's the most simple way to do it. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To