On Tue, 5 Mar 2013, Anatol Belski wrote:
I've reworked the patch from
http://nebm.ist.utl.pt/~glopes/misc/date_period_interval_ser.diff
(mentioned by tony2001) for bug #63437, that seems to fix the issue.
That patch was ported back to 5.3 and adapted to the current 5.4+.
Both variants
On Fri, 8 Mar 2013, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Christopher Jones
christopher.jo...@oracle.com wrote:
Felipe added ZO+ to the bugs.php.net Package affected drop-down today.
Hmmh.. That shouldn't be there as the current official issue tracker
for it is on
On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 21:36:41 +0100, Derick Rethans der...@php.net wrote:
On Tue, 5 Mar 2013, Anatol Belski wrote:
I've reworked the patch from
http://nebm.ist.utl.pt/~glopes/misc/date_period_interval_ser.diff
(mentioned by tony2001) for bug #63437, that seems to fix the issue.
That patch was
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
I wonder what would be a good way to avoid allocating a temporary zval
for the key and freeing it again. Do you think it would be okay to pass
EX_T((opline+1)-result.var).tmp_var into -get_current_key() so the value
can be
Hi,
On Sat, 2013-03-09 at 21:57 +0100, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 21:36:41 +0100, Derick Rethans der...@php.net wrote:
On Tue, 5 Mar 2013, Anatol Belski wrote:
I've reworked the patch from
http://nebm.ist.utl.pt/~glopes/misc/date_period_interval_ser.diff
(mentioned by
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 21:36:41 +0100, Derick Rethans der...@php.net wrote:
On Tue, 5 Mar 2013, Anatol Belski wrote:
I've reworked the patch from
http://nebm.ist.utl.pt/~glopes/misc/date_period_interval_ser.diff
(mentioned by tony2001) for
