On 16 September 2013 03:36, David Soria Parra d...@php.net wrote:
We have recenty discussed a lot of new language features and RFC while our
github pull requests are continously growing without getting pulled. We
have 74 open pull request.
So this is a clal for participation in helping to
Hi all!
On 10 September 2013 13:29, Michael Wallner m...@php.net wrote:
On 28 August 2013 08:14, Michael Wallner m...@php.net wrote:
On 27 August 2013 23:17, Gustavo Lopes glo...@nebm.ist.utl.pt wrote:
I think it's generally a good idea, but I have some concerns:
...
Fixed. The input stream
How to actually get karma to manage those pull request in github?
I know what you mean. I've been sitting on a patch I did for an RFC for
awhile now because I don't have karma to post it. I know I could just add
to the pull request queue but I'd much rather put a few more together first
so I
In the past week we've been hammered with 18 new pull requests, which I'm
happy with (especially with the other internals discussions). But now the
hard reviewing work begins, any help would be welcomed.
Thank you David Soria Parra for the merges and cleanup, and thank you
Nikita Popov for the
On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 09:08 +0200, Michael Wallner wrote:
On 16 September 2013 03:36, David Soria Parra d...@php.net wrote:
We have recenty discussed a lot of new language features and RFC while our
github pull requests are continously growing without getting pulled. We
have 74 open pull
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Michael Wallner m...@php.net wrote:
On 16 September 2013 03:36, David Soria Parra d...@php.net wrote:
We have recenty discussed a lot of new language features and RFC while
our
github pull requests are continously growing without getting pulled. We
have 74
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Michael Wallner m...@php.net wrote:
On 16 September 2013 03:36, David Soria Parra d...@php.net wrote:
We have recenty discussed a lot of new language features and RFC while
our
In the light of the recent scandal of the NSA ( others) attacking encryption
would it be a good idea to see if we can get an audit of all the security
related code in PHP ? It would do a bit to help boost confidence in PHP - and
might even find something (although I hope not).
What I am thinking
On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 11:56 +0100, Alain Williams wrote:
In the light of the recent scandal of the NSA ( others) attacking encryption
would it be a good idea to see if we can get an audit of all the security
related code in PHP ? It would do a bit to help boost confidence in PHP - and
might
hi Bob!
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Bob Weinand bobw...@hotmail.com wrote:
Am 14.09.2013 um 23:21 schrieb Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com:
I think we need a RFC for this non trivial change (from a user land point
of view and to change the engine). Do you know how to proceed to create
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 01:56:58PM +0200, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 11:56 +0100, Alain Williams wrote:
In the light of the recent scandal of the NSA ( others) attacking
encryption
would it be a good idea to see if we can get an audit of all the security
related code
Hi!
This is the (official) RFC thread for the patch proposed in
http://php.markmail.org/message/7rn4mbwkbytqa3ig
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/keywords_as_identifiers
Any feedback about the RFC or the implementation?
Bob Weinand
PHP itself doesn't do much crypto stuff. We rely mostly on libs like
openssl etc. and provide hashing algorithms which follow the
specifications. If the specifications are bad this is a global non-PHP
issue.
That's all true, of course. But there are still places where new patches to
the
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 01:44:16PM +0100, Alain Williams wrote:
Note that most of these things don't refer to PHP directly. i.e.
encryption between user and PHP is usually done by the web server.
Encryption between PHP and databases by database libraries. If
applications built on top of
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 09:01:02 +0200, Michael Wallner m...@php.net wrote:
On 10 September 2013 13:29, Michael Wallner m...@php.net wrote:
On 28 August 2013 08:14, Michael Wallner m...@php.net wrote:
On 27 August 2013 23:17, Gustavo Lopes glo...@nebm.ist.utl.pt wrote:
I think it's generally a
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Sara Golemon poll...@php.net wrote:
I'd like to go forward with voting on this. Are there any issues that
still
need to be resolved?
Assuming the RFC as-is represents the current state, I'm +1 on all of it.
I'm not a fan of some of the proposed alterations
I'd like to go forward with voting on this. Are there any issues that still
need to be resolved?
Assuming the RFC as-is represents the current state, I'm +1 on all of it.
I'm not a fan of some of the proposed alterations which would translate
arrays (a la call_user_func_array()). To
I've seen something similar on Debian; it might be a patch that
your distro is shipping on top of PHP.
Edward
Excerpts from Alain Williams's message of Sat Sep 14 04:45:41 -0700 2013:
Hi,
I am running a PHP script at the command line and piping the output through
less:
./myScript |
Hi internals!
I started the vote on the variadic functions RFC:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/variadics#vote
Thanks,
Nikita
Assuming the RFC as-is represents the current state, I'm +1 on all of it.
I'm not a fan of some of the proposed alterations which would translate
arrays (a la call_user_func_array()). To clarify, the following output is
what I'd expect:
function f(...$args) {
echo count($args);
}
-Original Message-
From: Nikita Popov [mailto:nikita@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 3:03 PM
To: Stas Malyshev
Cc: PHP internals
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Syntax for variadic functions
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Stas Malyshev
smalys...@sugarcrm.comwrote:
On 14.09.13 13:45, Alain Williams wrote:
./myScript | less
Since less is an interactive program it puts the terminal into 'raw' mode so
that it can read characters one at a time. However, when I do the above I find
that the commands that I type to less are echoed back to me and not acted
-Original Message-
From: Zeev Suraski [mailto:z...@zend.com]
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 11:52 PM
To: 'Nikita Popov'; 'Stas Malyshev'
Cc: 'PHP internals'
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Syntax for variadic functions
-Original Message-
From: Nikita Popov
Hi all,
I notice there are several Withdrawn status RFCs by ircmaxell, aka
Anthony Ferrara.
I am aware that he withdrew all his RFCs when he rage-quitted (his
words) internals. However, some of these RFCs are for features I'd love
to see, particularly Structural Type Hinting.
Since he has
hi,
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
Hi all,
I notice there are several Withdrawn status RFCs by ircmaxell, aka Anthony
Ferrara.
I am aware that he withdrew all his RFCs when he rage-quitted (his words)
internals. However, some of these RFCs are for
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:01:37PM +0200, Martin Jansen wrote:
On 14.09.13 13:45, Alain Williams wrote:
./myScript | less
Since less is an interactive program it puts the terminal into 'raw' mode so
that it can read characters one at a time. However, when I do the above I
find
26 matches
Mail list logo
