On 7.3.2006 15:44 Uhr, Steph Fox wrote:
1) goto and break label
2) goto only (like C)
3) break label only (like Java)
4) nothing
Sorry for the noise. I was told to vote.
Meaning, I don't care, never had a use for GOTO, but if the caring
majority thinks, it's needed, why not :)
chregu
5.1.3 snap news file contains the following fragment:
- Improved SPL: (Marcus)
- Fixed issues with not/double calling of constructors of SPL iterators.
- Fixed issues with info-class/file-class in SPL directory handling
classes.
- Fixed ArrayIterator::seek().
- Added
Xuefer wrote:
is there any chance that a buffer in output buffer will be supported?
Nope, as this can cause all sorts of evil things.
Regards,
--
Michael - mike(@)php.net http://dev.iworks.at/ext-http/http-functions.html.gz
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Michael Wallner wrote:
Dmitry Stogov wrote:
1) goto and break label
+0
3) break label only (like Java)
+1
You do realize that this is:
label:
while(condition) {
break label;
}
As a C programmer this confuses me to no end. When I see label: I
expect
On 07 March 2006 09:28, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Please reviw and vote.
1) goto and break label
2) goto only (like C)
3) break label only (like Java)
4) nothing
1) +0.25
2) -1e38
3) +1e38
4) -infinity
Or, in other words, I want labelled break, and I don't want to have to emulate
it with
since i'm using php and it's documentation for years, i wanted to contribute my
part to the php project.
i'm interested in translating (english, german, polish) and maintaining the
documentation, because it still has a lot of bugs or outdated informations...
got this site suggested from tobsn
include('php://filter/string.toupper/resource=/foo/bar/baz');
Filters can be stacked, set on the read or write chains individually (though
the latter hardly matters for include/require), and resource can be another
wrapper, not just a local file.
Ref: http://www.php.net/wrappers.php
-Sara
Sara Golemon schrieb:
include('php://filter/string.toupper/resource=/foo/bar/baz');
I do not want to change the include/require calls but instead set up
a filter for the standard ones.
--
Sebastian Bergmann http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/
GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7
kjc wrote:
What is it that php5.1.2 reads /etc/group on startup to setgroup?
My Solaris 10 boxes use LDAP as a NIS replacement so that we don't have to
manage individual group files on all the servers.
When I start Apache without php I see this the dtrace dtruss script:
Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Hi,
Because of some confused people I reverted break label patch and post it
for discussion once again together with GOTO patch.
Please reviw and vote.
1) goto and break label
2) goto only (like C)
3) break label only (like Java)
4) nothing
My vote: (1) +0.5, (4) +0.5
I'm not concerned by the vote.
Please, Bertrand, the goto/labelled breaks discussions were held ad
infinitum last June, and back in December, and again more recently. The
_only_ concern now is the vote. Anything else will lead to so much noise on
here we can't hear ourselves think, and since
Steph Fox wrote:
I'm not concerned by the vote.
Please, Bertrand, the goto/labelled breaks discussions were held ad
infinitum last June, and back in December, and again more recently. The
_only_ concern now is the vote. Anything else will lead to so much noise
on here we can't hear
Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Hi,
Because of some confused people I reverted break label patch and post it
for discussion once again together with GOTO patch.
Please reviw and vote.
1) goto and break label
2) goto only (like C)
3) break label only (like Java)
4) nothing
My vote: (1) +0.5, (4) +0.5
Thanks for responding...
I see the following GID calls from libc, supplying both w/php and w/o php.
Hmm. what next?
logfile: CALLCOUNT
log.dappprof-apachectl:libc.so.1
getgid 1
log.dappprof-apachectl:libc.so.1
getpgid
That's 'one man one vote' NOT 'one mail one vote' :)
- Original Message -
From: bertrand Gugger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: internals@lists.php.net; Steph Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Dmitry Stogov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 11:57 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: GOTO and/or
I'd still say we make it this. It's reasonable and consistent.
- David
Am 09.03.2006 um 01:13 schrieb Andi Gutmans:
This patch is a bit rough. I'll try and think if there's a more
elegant way.
Andi
At 01:06 PM 3/8/2006, Mike Lively wrote:
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 17:37 +0300, Dmitry
Yeah I agree but I'm less concerned about the
naming at this point but how to implement it assuming we find a name.
Andi
At 04:18 PM 3/8/2006, David Zülke wrote:
I'd still say we make it this. It's reasonable and consistent.
- David
Am 09.03.2006 um 01:13 schrieb Andi Gutmans:
This patch
If the Java-like syntax is seen as confusing, what about, as in some other
languages, interpolating the label into the for/foreach/while statement:
for () label {...} or for label (...) {...}
a. label: for () { break label; } AND label: { for () {
break label; } } (see
Please, Xuefer! Your vote was already recorded, shhh!
- Original Message -
From: Xuefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ford, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Dmitry Stogov [EMAIL PROTECTED]; internals@lists.php.net
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 5:19 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] GOTO and/or BREAK LABEL
19 matches
Mail list logo
