Hi!
The filesystem issues are mostly due to what we do in TS mode, way too
much pointless operations, even if the real cache helps a little bit
here (take this comment with a bit of salt: as in delta with the cache
between TS and NTS).
What we do in TS mode with filesystem that could explain
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
The filesystem issues are mostly due to what we do in TS mode, way too
much pointless operations, even if the real cache helps a little bit
here (take this comment with a bit of salt: as in delta with the cache
It is a 2-step-migration
step 1 - php 4 and 5.3
step 2 - only php 5.3
because there are various clients using that system.
the development cycle cant stop with bug fixing and new features required by
clients.
no way to make a branch.
We know that in the step 1 is a very horrible solution, but
Hi!
This delta has very little impact on real world apps except those
doing exclusively such ops.
The benchmarks I did suggest otherwise. Real world apps do huge number
of file ops like file_exists(). And while many apps aggressively cache
DB calls and such, filesystem calls are still
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Though, of course, maybe I'm wrong - what would you suggest is the problem
then? I saw similar slowdowns on 1-process benchmarks as on multi-process
server benchmarks - so I have hard time believing it has anything to
Am 01.02.2011 10:21, schrieb Mathias Grimm:
It is a 2-step-migration
nonsense
step 1 - php 4 and 5.3
the best way to trash something beautiflul
step 2 - only php 5.3
step 1 requires horrible code and so much work
and with step 2 you have even more work to
get the trash from step 1 clean
Hi.
I was looking at the cause for a test failing.
It came down to ...
size_t n;
if (n 0) {
// Code never reached as n is unsigned and cannot be negative.
}
I'm not a strong c developer, but from reading it seems that size_t is
always unsigned.
Using the windows compiler (and turning on
On 1 February 2011 15:07, Andrey Hristov p...@hristov.com wrote:
Hi Richard,
On 02/01/2011 02:35 PM, Richard Quadling wrote:
Hi.
I was looking at the cause for a test failing.
It came down to ...
size_t n;
if (n 0) {
// Code never reached as n is unsigned and cannot be negative.
}
On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 01:04 +0100, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com
wrote:
But I strongly believe in a threaded base solution for windows. That's
the only way to get anywhere close to the performance we can see on
other platforms
someone can help me to make the ZEND_ASSIGN operator overloading?
i've looked de pecl operator extension but i dont have the necessary skills
to do that.
Thanks a lot, for all the help about zend mm guys, i'm very grateful.
Thanks,A.
--- On Sun, 1/30/11, Ben Schmidt mail_ben_schm...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
From: Ben Schmidt mail_ben_schm...@yahoo.com.au
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Zend mm
To: Adi Mutu adi_mut...@yahoo.com
Cc:
11 matches
Mail list logo
