On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Elizabeth M Smith
auroraeosr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/5/2011 10:48 AM, Christopher Jones wrote:
On 3/5/11 5:58 AM, Elizabeth Smith wrote:
Attached is a patch that works for both 5.3
and trunk, includes an additional test for the issue.
Hi Elizabeth,
Can
Hi!
Can you tell what exactly you're doing? Why is there any cast in the first
place?
As far as I can see, the include should eventually call
php_stream_open_for_zend_ex, which should give a ZEND_HANDLE_STREAM file
handle that defers reading to _php_stream_read and fsize to
Hi!
What's the status of patch for NULL-in-filename issue for trunk? I see
patch for 5.3 was made by Pierre 3.5 months ago with note trunk will
have patch later, but nothing happened as it seems. Anybody's working
on it?
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM:
Hi!
PHP file streams provide very powerful and useful abstraction layer over
the I/O-related functions. However, there's a group of functions which
are excluded from this support - namely, touch(), chmod(), chown() and
chgrp() - i.e., functions dealing with file metadata. This lead to
Hi!
I think a better option would be a function to convert a php socket stream
into a socket resource. That would avoid limiting this to
socket_get_options/socket_set_options and polluting the socket ext
functions prologue with these conversions.
I think we already have
hi Stas,
Yes, there was a discussion in progress about adding or not a input
parameter for filenames to do all the checks. That's the only stopping
point back then (in January afair). I will checkpost again the
question and proposal to see if we can get that sorted now.
Cheers,
On Mon, Mar 7,
Hi!
Yes, there was a discussion in progress about adding or not a input
parameter for filenames to do all the checks. That's the only stopping
point back then (in January afair). I will checkpost again the
question and proposal to see if we can get that sorted now.
If there are questions
It was not about a better implentation, such changes are not possible in
5.3.
The goal is to avoid many code duplication and makes sure than any new code
has this check in place.
I can't think of any other similar patches not present in trunk.
On 7 Mar 2011 08:04, Stas Malyshev
