On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 01:28, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
On 7/11/11 4:20 PM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
I agree, it would make more sense to have the votings over before
doing the next Alpha, so theres time to cook up relevant patches and
commit them.
Well, OK,
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:33:31 +0100, Paul Dixon wrote:
personally long term, I would aim to remove the position index entries
completely.
Which would make it unusable with list().
Mike
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
hi,
As of now I do not think we should allow this change, whether the RFC
is accepted or not does not matter as it will badly break BC. Unless
there is a patch allowing this change without affecting existing code
(main point being namespaced code working smoothly), this RFC should
be rejected.
2011/7/12 Michael Wallner m...@php.net:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:33:31 +0100, Paul Dixon wrote:
personally long term, I would aim to remove the position index entries
completely.
Which would make it unusable with list().
+1 this will be huge BC break for this function. Please, don't remove
On 12/07/11 11:09, Pierre Joye wrote:
hi,
Hi,
As of now I do not think we should allow this change, whether the RFC
is accepted or not does not matter as it will badly break BC. Unless
there is a patch allowing this change without affecting existing code
(main point being namespaced code
PS: I cannot change my vote on https://wiki.php.net/todo/php54/vote, is it a
known issue?
if you don't have @php.net account, or 'voting' group membership in
the wiki, then you cannot vote, or change your vote.
this change was made yesterday to fix the issue that the technical
restriction for
On 12/07/11 12:12, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
PS: I cannot change my vote on https://wiki.php.net/todo/php54/vote, is it a
known issue?
if you don't have @php.net account, or 'voting' group membership in
the wiki, then you cannot vote, or change your vote.
this change was made yesterday to fix the
Zitat von Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Jan Schneider j...@horde.org wrote:
Zitat von Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 11:17 PM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com
wrote:
hi,
As I could agree on this fact, I can't find any
Hi,
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:09:33 +0200, Pierre Joye wrote:
As of now I do not think we should allow this change, whether the RFC is
accepted or not does not matter as it will badly break BC. Unless there
is a patch allowing this change without affecting existing code (main
point being
On 2011-07-12, Johannes Schlüter johan...@schlueters.de wrote:
On Sun, 2011-07-10 at 19:41 +0200, Nikita Popov wrote:
E.g. Writing
class Evaluator {
public function eval() {
}
}
Does in no way create an ambiguity with the eval language construct
PHP implements.
On 2011-07-12, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
As of now I do not think we should allow this change, whether the RFC
is accepted or not does not matter as it will badly break BC. Unless
there is a patch allowing this change without affecting existing code
(main point being
Hi guys,
there is an open bug (https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=54488) which
seems only to be triggered when using FPM: a segfault in
zend_assign_to_variable.
My knowledge of Zend internal stuff is limited and I really don't know
how this can be related to FPM. If someone have time to look at it
12 matches
Mail list logo
