You want to compare Mono performance to .NET performance - I'm sorry, but I
don't see how that's even relevant?
Your benchmark would be relevant if I was proposing you write a PHP
interpreter and run that on Mono.
What I'm proposing (and what Phalanger does) is to compile PHP code to CLR
Rasmus, I'm looking at that first chart you linked to, the one about
real world Wordpress performance. It has three lines on it. The
terrible one is standard PHP without a bytecode cache. Nobody in their
right mind runs PHP without a bytecode cache. It's only there to make
the chart look more
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 08:58 -0500, Rasmus Schultz wrote:
What I'm proposing (and what Phalanger does) is to compile PHP code to
CLR
bytecode, and running it directly on the VM - I'm not saying run an
interpreter under the VM. That would be pointless.
For *this* group there's little sense in
Hello,
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Rasmus Schultz ras...@mindplay.dk wrote:
Don't take this the wrong way, I'm merely trying to provoke your thoughts a
bit with this e-mail! :-)
Has it occurred to anyone, to abandon the official PHP codebase and adopt
Phalanger instead?
Some convincing
Rasmus Lerdorf rasmus at lerdorf.com writes:
-snip-
This is a complete non-starter. The bulk of PHP users are on
non-Windows, especially Linux, and Mono performance on Linux is really
not good. Last time I checked it was an order of magnitude slower on
Linux compared to the same hardware
