Just to make everything clear, I'm not sure if it was my mistake change 5_4
branch, but currently 5_4 branch (after 322964 commit) solves the header
problem.
Thanks for the work.
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:04:34 +0200, yoram bar haim wrote:
Sorry, problem is not solved yet.
I committed a
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 03:58 -0500, Michael Wallner wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:04:34 +0200, yoram bar haim wrote:
Sorry, problem is not solved yet.
I committed a possible fix to trunk. It's pretty much along
the patch from you, I just hat to fix crashes in the cli server
and need to
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Lior Kaplan lio...@zend.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 03:58 -0500, Michael Wallner wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:04:34 +0200, yoram bar haim wrote:
Sorry, problem is not solved yet.
I committed a possible fix to trunk. It's pretty much along
the
Hi,
I was thinking that it could be a good idea (after current version migrates
to testing) to upload 5.4RCx to unstable to begin work on transition as soon
as possible. RC releases should have stable API(?), so application wise
there's no problem. I'll fill a release critical bug in our BTS, so
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:57:08 +0200, Lior Kaplan wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 03:58 -0500, Michael Wallner wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:04:34 +0200, yoram bar haim wrote:
Sorry, problem is not solved yet.
I committed a possible fix to trunk. It's pretty much along the patch
from you, I
Hi Ondřej,
I'd wait for RC7 in any case, and with some luck it will be the final RC
for 5.4.0.
With my Debian hat on, I would wait for the official release, as to
minimize the noise we'll get in Debian from testing RCs. The recent RCs
all had some major issues fixed/changed in them (which is
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Ccing PHP internals to let them know and ask if it is a good idea (the 5.4RC
will be probably used by more people when uploaded to Debian unstable, i.e.
it means more testing, but also more bugreports).
Sounds like a good idea to me. This is why we have
hi,
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Lior Kaplan lio...@zend.com wrote:
Hi Ondřej,
I'd wait for RC7 in any case, and with some luck it will be the final RC
for 5.4.0.
With my Debian hat on, I would wait for the official release, as to
minimize the noise we'll get in Debian from testing
On 02/01/2012 06:11 PM, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Hi,
I was thinking that it could be a good idea (after current version migrates
to testing) to upload 5.4RCx to unstable to begin work on transition as soon
as possible. RC releases should have stable API(?), so application wise
there's no problem.
Working with Pierre Joye on the build hosts (for Windows), automated testing
and test infrastructure for PHP/Windows.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi,
As many of you know we made huge improvements in PHP 5.4 memory usage (enabling
higher concurrency) and runtime performance.
We've done our own benchmarks but it'd be great to hear from others re: what
you're seeing with your real-world apps.
If you have any experiences to share please do.
hi Andi,
We do automatic perf tests as part of the CI. Some of the results can
be seen here for example here:
http://windows.php.net/downloads/snaps/ostc/pftt/perf/results-20120119-5.3.9-5.4.0RC6.html
for a 5.3.9 vs 5.4.0RC6 comparison. There are other in the same location.
We are going to do
Cache results are of course important. Memory usage would be great too.
Thanks!!
Andi
-Original Message-
From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 10:19 AM
To: Andi Gutmans
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 Benchmarks
hi
hi!
I could add zend optimizer to the stack but we do not have a license
(or is it free for the optimizer only?).
APC should join the party soon, not sure yet if it is ready yet. We
will run compat tests first.
About the memory usage, yes, this is on my todos. I have a tool for
that (on win)
Optimizer+ is free and packaged in Zend Server Community Edition. Happy to get
you and anyone else who wants to run benchmarks a copy out of cycle. We haven't
put a preview up yet but have it working.
Re: memory usage, I've seen some great results so definitely will be nice to
see what others
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 18:08 +, Andi Gutmans wrote:
We've done our own benchmarks but it'd be great to hear from others
Can we also hear from you? :-)
johannes
who doesn't have proper benchmarks himself, but is interested in
seeing them ;-)
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development
APC should join the party soon, not sure yet if it is ready yet. We
will run compat tests first.
I ran into a crashing blocker with APC on 5.4:
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=60845
If anyone has the bandwidth to look into that, I'd love to help out in any way
I can.
(Sorry for the thread
Absolutely. Will gather those and send them over...
Andi
-Original Message-
From: Johannes Schlüter [mailto:johan...@schlueters.de]
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 10:49 AM
To: Andi Gutmans
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 Benchmarks
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at
Type Hinting was not in the original RFC, is type hinting stable enough to be
included with the Property Accessors functionality or is there no clear
agreement made with them yet?
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/propertygetsetsyntax-as-implemented?#read-only_and_write-only_properties
Could be:
?php
19 matches
Mail list logo
