Explained here: http://lxr.php.net/xref/PHP_TRUNK/main/php.h#415
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 5:06 AM, Levi Morrison le...@php.net wrote:
The macro offsetof is required by the C89 standard to be defined in
stddef.h and remains in newer standards. The macro XtOffsetOf is
non-standard that is as far
The macro offsetof is required by the C89 standard to be defined in
stddef.h and remains in newer standards. The macro XtOffsetOf is
non-standard that is as far as I can tell a part of the X Toolkit
Intrinsics or Xlib.
Does anyone know the reasons why we are using the non-standard macro
instead
Hi Marc,
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Marc Bennewitz dev@mabe.berlin wrote:
This one is not compatible with current code as you have to alias the PHP
namespace to the root one before using full classes like \DateTime.
Right.
We are better to have PHP namespace for internal
On Jun 4, 2015, at 10:00, Rowan Collins rowan.coll...@gmail.com wrote:
: http://3v4l.org/l75kf
HHVM's percentages are lower primarily because its for loop measure is much
slower in absolute terms.
At the risk of distracting from the central topic, I'd like to point out that
HHVM's times
Marc Bennewitz wrote on 04/06/2015 10:01:
http://3v4l.org/eJK07
See the total amount of execution time recorded.
If we really need pure execution time, then it should record for loop
execution time
with empty body.
- incl. displaying the time for the loop: http://3v4l.org/1vZJI
Percentages
On 06/04/2015 10:01 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
Hi all,
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 12:07 AM, Sara Golemon poll...@php.net wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 1:33 AM, Dominic Grostate
codekest...@googlemail.com wrote:
Has there been any discussion or consideration towards migrating or at
least aliasing
Hi all,
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 12:07 AM, Sara Golemon poll...@php.net wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 1:33 AM, Dominic Grostate
codekest...@googlemail.com wrote:
Has there been any discussion or consideration towards migrating or at
least aliasing all built in classes to a Php vendor
On 06/04/2015 06:35 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
Hi Brian,
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Brian Moon br...@moonspot.net wrote:
This is a better representation of what you are trying to show. It removes
all the magic call back stuff that could be adding to the slowness you are
seeing. In