Hi Pierre,
> > While there is considerable division in whether or not members of internals
> > want to adopt namespaces,
> > I hope that the final outcome of the poll will be accepted by members of
> > internals
> > as what the representative of the majority of the members of internals
> >
Hi Tim,
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 4:40 PM Tim Düsterhus, WoltLab GmbH
wrote:
>
> Hi Pierre
>
> On 1/11/22 4:48 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> > Also sensitive data goes way beyond arguments, GDPR brings a lot of
> > issues here too. Userland packages like monolog provide filters or
> > custom output, I
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 3:05 PM Tim Düsterhus, WoltLab GmbH <
duester...@woltlab.com> wrote:
> Hi Internals!
>
> this is a follow-up for my "Pre-RFC" email from last Friday, January, 7th.
>
> Christoph Becker granted me RFC editing permissions and I've now written
> up our proposal as a proper
Hi Pierre
On 1/11/22 4:48 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
Also sensitive data goes way beyond arguments, GDPR brings a lot of
issues here too. Userland packages like monolog provide filters or
custom output, I think that is where it should be handled.
I believe that the author of a function is in the
Hi Alex
On 1/11/22 4:10 AM, Alexandru Pătrănescu wrote:
As the trace in the exception is in the same format as the one generated
by debug_backtrace(),
do you intend to have the changes affecting debug_backtrace()
and debug_print_backtrace()?
My proof of concept patch adjusts the internal
Hi Dan
On 1/10/22 6:01 PM, Dan Ackroyd wrote:
How do other languages handle this problem? Or how do they avoid it in
the first place?
Ryan already replied here, but I've also researched this:
- Java is unable to provide parameters in stack traces.
- In C you generally have a core dump which
