Hello,
As this is a new function do you consider any namespace for it? Based on
passed RFC[1] allowing for namespaces in bundled extensions it would be
nice to introduce new functions with namespace. Maybe the namespace could
be voted in the RFC separately?
Kind regards,
Jorg
[1]
> What do you mean? Do you mean that the constant was legal at some point?
Sorry, but I don't have this knowledge. It's invalid since 2004, but I
suppose this format was implemented before then. Undoubtedly the format is
invalid now.
The usage in 1000 most popular libraries:
DATE_ISO8601 (4
On Sun, May 21, 2023, at 7:18 AM, Rowan Tommins wrote:
> On 21 May 2023 13:00:30 BST, Dan Ackroyd wrote:
>>On Sun, 21 May 2023 at 06:16, Marc wrote:
>>>
>>> Do you think this could be an acceptable BC-break
>>
>>No. Suggesting changing a 30 year old maths operations is a huge BC break.
>>
>>> or
On 21 May 2023 13:00:30 BST, Dan Ackroyd wrote:
>On Sun, 21 May 2023 at 06:16, Marc wrote:
>>
>> Do you think this could be an acceptable BC-break
>
>No. Suggesting changing a 30 year old maths operations is a huge BC break.
>
>> or should this be a different function?
>
>Just make your own that
On Sun, 21 May 2023 at 06:16, Marc wrote:
>
> Do you think this could be an acceptable BC-break
No. Suggesting changing a 30 year old maths operations is a huge BC break.
> or should this be a different function?
Just make your own that does precisely what you want...
cheers
Dan
Ack
--
PHP
