Hi,
can we have a macro that implements this equality check - whether
2 zvals point to the same object?
Andrey
Andi Gutmans wrote:
You also have to compare Z_OBJ_HT_P(objA) == Z_OBJ_HT_P(objB) in
addition to Z_OBJ_HANDLE_P.
After checking both of these your code will work.
At 10:57 PM
George Schlossnagle wrote:
Hi,
Coogle brought this up, shouldn't this be ok?
interface Bar {
function foo();
}
interface Baz {
function foo();
}
class A implements Bar, Baz {
function foo() {}
}
Throws a redclaration error in 5.0.1.
George Schlossnagle
-- Prinicipal
Andi Gutmans wrote:
I'd like to roll 5.0.2 tomorrow. Has anyone had a chance to test
5.0.2RC1? Can I go ahead?
Ilia, when are you planning on rolling 4.3.9?
Andi
Wasn't there some rule like that releases are made on thursdays?
Maybe someone who is under windows may merge the hypot() fix
so to be
Serban Gh. Ghita wrote:
hello
please add the following link at the link section (php.net/links.php).
Romania
PHPromania.net (http://www.phpromania.net) - Romanian PHP Community,
articles, tutorials, online discussions, forums
Serban Gh. Ghita
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrey
--
PHP Internals - PHP
Sam Hobbs wrote:
Rasmus Lerdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am not sure why you assume this to be a PHP problem.
I thought I was being reasonable. I thought I was clear about saying I was
not sure it is a PHP problem. I was trying to help by helping diagnose a
Sam Hobbs wrote:
Thank you. If that is what is happening then I agree that it is not PHP
issue, so I am happy to go elsewhere for help. The only relevant suggestion
is that it might help to impove the warning message and to put something in
the php documentation to help people know where to
Jan Schneider wrote:
Zitat von Derick Rethans [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:
a) I will try and send internals@ an updated version of the realpath()
cache in the next few days. This should give a lot of bang for the buck
because realpath() is probably the
Steph wrote:
That's because nobody applied the fix after D's patch yet.
-Original Message-
From: David Kingma - Jool.nl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 September 2004 12:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP-DEV] Snaps.php.net
Not sure if this is the right place to ask, but the win32
Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
That should have been a #ifndef SKIP_PATH_CHECKS there. And it is there
to get rid of a non-critical ftell().
Attached is the patch with this corrected, and corrected white space.
And yes, there is no doubt that this patch can
Well, if the engine is unstable state why the registered shutdown function is being
executed then ? :)
Andrey
Andi Gutmans wrote:
I think this makes sense because PHP could be in an unstable state.
Think EG(exit_status) covers all possible situations? No time to check
now how it differs from
Curt Zirzow wrote:
* Thus wrote Antony Dovgal:
And the last one, the most questionable patch.
ATM ZE2 calls destructor at the end of the request and no matter
is there were a fatal error (which should probably stop executing
the script). In some cases it leads to nasty segfaults (me and
report's
Hi,
probably MBO_0 stands for MarcusBOerger_0 . I am not sure whether this was somewehere in
the coding standards
document, but this means that the programmer has commented the code by using the
preprocessor. The programmer
has to put his name and a suffix _0 . Usually code commented this way
ext/soap pumped up the minimal requirement. It uses xmlBufferCreateStatic which
is not found in the 2.5.x libxml2 . I upgraded to 2.6.7 and this helped. Probably
when --disable-soap is used one can use 2.5.10+ . For me
libxml2-2.5.10-29.i586.rpm (suse 9.0) didn't work.
andrey
George Schlossnagle
ok, needs clearance. 2.5.10 didn't work for me when SOAP support
was enabled. I didn't try compiling without it since I just needed this
extension compiled (usually I leave it out as well as the XML stuff).
Andrey
Christian Stocker wrote:
On 27.8.2004 9:31 Uhr, Andrey Hristov wrote:
ext/soap
isn't the situation that several zvals can reference one object?
Andrey
Michael Wallner wrote:
Hi,
I have an hopefully simple question;
imagine the following statement:
obj = (struct obj_struct *) zend_object_store_get_object(zval TSRMLS_CC);
Ok, now I'm in a situation where I'd need the other way
The engine gurus have the final word :)
Andrey
Michael Wallner wrote:
Hi Andrey Hristov, you wrote:
isn't the situation that several zvals can reference one object?
Should this be read as No way, sorry? :)
Regards,
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit
Hi,
today I saw a note left by a person in the documentation on php.net
about the lack of function named interface_exists(). Currently there is
class_exists() which returns true always when the name is a declared
class or a known interface. However an interface is not a class, some
will say that
Is it good idea (and is it possible) to disallow GOTO in main() ?
Andrey
Quoting Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 21:34, BDKR wrote:
Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Exceptions are not an OOP feature per-se. They are a means for out-of-
Hello,
the topic clearly states what I would like to achieve. I know that parameter
can be forced to be passed by reference when declared but in my case
this is not an option (still). I would like to determine this at run time
based on some other conditions I have to check whether the param
is a
Hi,
I have written a patch which I think fixes bug 26737 : private/protected member
variables are not serialized (the names are returned from __sleep())
The URL of the patch is :
http://hristov.com/andrey/projects/php_stuff/patches/bug26737.patch.txt
Comments are welcomed?
Thanks,
andrey
P.S.
Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Andrey,
Can you take a look also at http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=29421
We don't affect those. We simply correct the sorting to something
understandable when it comes to edge cases with zero. We don't touch
any other automatic typeconversion related behavior as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marcus Boerger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello Derrell,
it is a public interface! Unfortunatley we still have no way of documenting
classes on the docs page.
Thanks. Steph forwarded me this link, which could be provided on the docs
page as additional reference, until
Quoting DvDmanDT [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
And my point still remains. There are an awful lot of PHP programmers out
there who really don't need an extra way to write for(), or while(), or
do..while(). It makes maintenance work harder when you have a mixture of
styles in there to cope with.
Paul G wrote:
folks,
would someone with ml admin privs take a look and, if present, remove an
@tgpwizards.com e-mail address subscription? the user has apparently put a sender
confirmation script in place that bombards me (and i'm sure others as well) with
confirmation requests. needless to
Quoting Paul G [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- Original Message -
From: Andrey Hristov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Paul G [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 4:18 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] list abuse
Paul G wrote:
folks,
Last time I looked
Sara Golemon wrote:
Thanks for the pointers, I at least see what I need to be exploring now
(though I havn't sat down to unfold its meaning yet). Cetainly the
implementation given earlier needs work whether its to make it work as
advertised or in the more limited fashion suggested in other posts.
Andi Gutmans wrote:
I talked to John about this yesterday. I'll take a closer look at this
within the coming days to see if this makes sense and how it affects BC
in general (if at all).
Can you take a look also at http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=29421
thanks,
andrey
--
PHP Internals - PHP
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
PHP is a not a type strict language, far from it and it is unlikely it'll ever
be such. It is also a not pure OOP language and I very much doubt it'll ever
be one.
While GOTO can be abused, so can any other language feature, such as OOP, or
the ability to include remote
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Thu, 2004-07-29 at 17:25, Timm Friebe wrote:
On Thu, 2004-07-29 at 04:12, Sara Golemon wrote:
I wrote up a patch for implementing gotos in php scripts a couple months ago
as an exercise in working with the Zend engine.
[...]
In the five or six year's I've been programming
Robert Cummings wrote:
Unmaintainable because of the ability to write cryptic code. There's
nothing cryptic about:
...code
goto cleanup:
...code
cleanup:
do {
.code...
if (something) break;
...code
} while (0);
...cleanup code...
Similar example in the PHP
Paul G wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Andrey Hristov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 8:00 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] GOTO operator
--- snip ---
Is the average Joe going to write parsers in the everydays work? Probably
Sara Golemon wrote:
do {
.code...
if (something) break;
...code
} while (0);
...cleanup code...
Are you suggesting a hack is better than the real thing?
-Sara
The hack is working. The manual says :
Advanced C users may be familiar with a different usage of the do..while loop,
to
Jason Garber wrote:
Hello,
I think we should add an INI option:
php_newbie true|false
;)
better make it :
enable_goto = on|off
of course making the code non-portable :)
andrey
p.s. ok guys and ladies, i am going to sleep
a little bit (i need recharging). probably without me
the ML will be
Frank M. Kromann wrote:
[snip]
The average Joe may not need goto in some case but he will find that it
simplifies
his job (but making code clumsy, something what he does not realize).
It is not because I don't like the power of goto, I would like not to be
given in the
hands of the newbie.
andrey
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
On July 29, 2004 09:13 pm, Andrey Hristov wrote:
Ok, I surrender. Go for it :)
I will pray and let God save me from ever maintaining spaghetti goto code
:)
Andrey,
Well, you already have a list of goto enabled languages to avoid, what's one
more? :-)
What should I do
Hello internals,
in the bug system there is an entry # 29421:
(http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=29421)
In short. in_array() and array_search() return the first
boolean(true) when the user looks for an element that
evaluates to true according to PHP's type juggling.
The opposite is also valid and
Currently on lxr.php.net there is at the top of every page an image stating
PHP4 Cross reference
thanks,
andrey
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
G usually comes from Globals and I have seen BG in ext/standard
so maybe BG means Basic functions Globals.
andrey
John Lim wrote:
Andi,
Just a few quick questions. What is the BG macro for? Eg.
if (zend_call_function(fci, BG(fci_cache) TSRMLS_CC) == SUCCESS)
Secondly, I think i need to
If someone has time and karma it will be nice if anoncvs.php is fixed
to add instruction how to checkout 5_0 branch and change the instructions
about PHP 5 to PHP 5.1.
Thanks,
andrey
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
John Lim wrote:
Andrey Hristov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
G usually comes from Globals and I have seen BG in ext/standard
so maybe BG means Basic functions Globals.
andrey
John Lim wrote:
Andi,
Just a few quick questions. What is the BG macro for? Eg
John Lim wrote:
Andrey Hristov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
G usually comes from Globals and I have seen BG in ext/standard
so maybe BG means Basic functions Globals.
andrey
John Lim wrote:
Andi,
Just a few quick questions. What is the BG macro for? Eg
You can find some usage of this function in ext/standard/array.c
hth,
andrey
Quoting Lester Caine [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
Check out zend_call_function(). It allows you to cache the function
lookup in the fci_cache parameter.
Where is the best place to find
is make test showing problems? (i am just currious).
I will try to review the patch later today (atm i am sick).
andrey
Cristiano Duarte wrote:
Hi all,
I needed to intersect an array with database records indexed by the primary
key, with an array with keys and there is no php function that will do
think the changes are minimal, so is it possible to merge into 5_0 ?
Cristiano Duarte wrote:
Andrey Hristov wrote:
is make test showing problems? (i am just currious).
I will try to review the patch later today (atm i am sick).
Nope. Make test shows the same errors before and after the patch.
I
Well, i think I have found a buggie (not related to these functions and I want to
investigate it). Thus I will delay the commit.
Cristiano Duarte wrote:
Andrey Hristov wrote:
Hallo Cristiano,
these 2 function will be added to HEAD in few minutes. I see that the
patch is kind of trivial and won't
Hello all,
John is since 2 days a father of a nice baby girl :
http://blog.coggeshall.org/archives/129_Welcome_Diana_Katheryn_Coggeshall.html
congrats,
andrey
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Well,
the new word clone made the same :
class a{
function clone() {}
}
is not working anymore :)
andrey
Sterling Hughes wrote:
?php
function null() {
}
null();
?
?php
class connected {
function true() {
}
}
if (connected::true()) {
echo bar;
}
?
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:26:33 +0200, dharana
I would say to wait 2 or 3 weeks.
This time is not critical for the code that is laying aside for months.
In my opinion the bug system will start to fill up with new bugs in
the next days or 2-3 weeks. Some percentage of these bugs will be
easy to fix. If the branch happens now, a bug hunter has
Peter Rendl wrote:
Edin Kadribasic wrote:
Memory limit checking is not compiled in on Windows. So bugs must be
caused by
something else.
Unfortunately phpinfo() does not show compile options for this build.
But http://snaps.php.net/win32/snapshot.log contains this line
snapshot: forcing
Nuno Lopes wrote:
Hello,
Today I was finishing writing the tidy docs and I've noted that the
functions $tidy-repairString() and $tidy-repairFile() simply don't work!
And I think these functions should be removed. I'll explain:
non-OO way:
?
echo tidy_repair_string($html);
?
OO way:
?
$tidy = new
Quoting Nuno Lopes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Maybe John has to make this methods static and they will work just like
the
functions.
Regards,
Andrey
Thats a good idea! But as we already have the non-OO function, I don't know
if it worth to create the static methods.
Nuno
For the purists
Quoting l0t3k [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
in my extension, i have a class which has methods which work slightly
differently depending on whether or not they are called statically.
as an example :
$original = new UnicodeString(HELLO WORLD,utf8);
$lower = UnicodeString::toLowerCase($original);
Privet Alex,
is it possible to show some results from benchmarking?
Thanks a lot,
Andrey
Quoting Alexander Valyalkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
My versions of strspn() strcspn() use faster and clear algorithm.
Below I provide simple test application, which compares speed and
results of old
Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 11:42 AM 5/18/2004 +0200, Christian Schneider wrote:
Sara Golemon wrote:
var_dump($someobject); shows only public properties (as I'd expect), but
print_r($someobject) shows all properties (explicitly identifying
protected/private props).
I agree with Derick and Andrey in
Sara Golemon wrote:
I hope that everyone will be happy with this. var_dump() is still BC
since
it does not print :public on public properties.
Fine with me. I'm not sure printing public is a bad idea. How many ppl
actually use this in their application for purposes other than debugging?
I sure
Hallo Marcus,
then will you cut the protected/private functionality from print_r() (so the
engine). Probably not :) . IMO var_dump() has been always superior for usage to
print_r(). During his presentation at the last conference Derick had to change
print_r() in his example to var_dump() to show
Sean Coates wrote:
Jason Garber wrote:
function setor($param, $default)
{
return (isset($param) ? $param : $default);
}
I tested it on 4.3.4 and 5.0 RC1, and it worked. Is passing an
undefined variable as a reference parameter a legal thing to do in PHP?
That bring up an interesting
Derick Rethans wrote:
I think it's a stupid idea (actually OO is a stupid idea but that's
something for another dicussion ;-):
1. In order to silently ignore failed queries you still have to put a
stupid try..except block around it.
If it's used only in object context.
2. KISS: PHP is
Hi internals,
maybe I am late for this for PHP 5 but just want to ask for opinion about dereferencing
indexes of arrays returned by functions. In PHP 5 is possible to dereference member
variables of an objects like :
someFunc()-someMember;
but this :
$b = someFunction()['someIndex'];
is not
Quoting Lester Caine [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
After all the studlyCaps API fixes
What impact will this have on all existing PHP applications
and extensions?
--
Lester Caine
-
L.S.Caine Electronic Services
--
PHP Internals - PHP
Quoting Derick Rethans [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:
OK Guys. It's decision time. I suggested to move to studlyCaps and keep
consistency with the new PHP 5 changes.
If we go with this, I think we should make these changes ASAP and try and
aim for RC2
how hard that would be.
Andi
At 11:56 PM 3/18/2004 +0100, Andrey Hristov wrote:
Hi internals,
what do you think about adding an optional parameter to
debug_print_backtrace() (PHP 5 only) so instead of printing the
stacktrace to get it as string. The information provided
Hi internals,
what do you think about adding an optional parameter to debug_print_backtrace() (PHP 5
only) so instead of printing the stacktrace to get it as string. The information provided
by debug_print_backtrace() is more than the information provided by debug_backtrace().
So if the
Hi,
this :
php -r 'class a{function a(){}} $a=new Reflection_Class(a);$b=$a-getMethod(a);
$b-invoke(NULL);'
segfaults on my machine and generates bus error on Jan Lehnardt's machine.
Andrey
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
Did this happen after my commit or is it a general problem?
Andi
At 02:03 PM 3/1/2004 +0100, Andrey Hristov wrote:
Hi,
this :
php -r 'class a{function a(){}} $a=new
Reflection_Class(a);$b=$a-getMethod(a); $b-invoke(NULL);'
segfaults on my machine and generates bus error
Andi Gutmans wrote:
Did this happen after my commit or is it a general problem?
Andi
At 02:03 PM 3/1/2004 +0100, Andrey Hristov wrote:
Hi,
this :
php -r 'class a{function a(){}} $a=new
Reflection_Class(a);$b=$a-getMethod(a); $b-invoke(NULL);'
segfaults on my machine and generates bus error
Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Timm,
i had the same expirience today too. And also for me it makes not much
sense. The constructor shouldn't check inheritance rules. And as a
consequence maybe interfaces shouldn't allow constructors.
Does inheritance include visibility rules? ;)
Andrey
--
PHP
Hi Paul,
may you compile your PHP binary with --enable-debug and after that run your
sample scrit for once. See if there are leaks.
Andrey
Quoting Paul Hudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Er, either the php-internals MARC archive doesn't show all attachments, or
my diff file got stripped en
Hello internals,
what's your opinion on whether the constructors must follow one of the
principles of the polymorphism - The visibility in extending classes must be
the same or better.
Example :
class parent {
public function __construct() {
}
}
class child extends parent {
private function
Hi internals,
in the following code __clone() have problems with member variables of type
object ($this-obj is null). If the comment is removed from the call to
__clone2() in __clone() then __clone2() also has problems with the vision. On
the other hand __clone2() has no problems when called
Hi internals,
here goes some interface fun :
class FubarOK has no problem implementing Iterator. interface NewIterator just
extends Iterator and adds nothing, and here comes the fun - an error message
when FubarProblem tries to implement NewIterator.
Code :
?php
class FubarOk implements Iterator
Pierre,
maybe this has something to do with Zeev's commits from this morning. Maybe this one :
http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/ZendEngine2/zend_compile.c?r1=1.519r2=1.520ty=u
Andrey
Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
Hello,
Using current HEAD, I got the following errors in make install-pear:
...
Installing
This is known issue and the problem was introduced this morning. A snapshot from yesterday
will work.
regards,
Andrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I downloaded the latest Windows zip of 5 from snaps this morning. It's
php-win32-200401281930.zip.
When I try to run either php or php-cgi, I get a long
A commit to fix the problem was just committed.
You have to wait for the next win32.
Andrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the answer, but I don't see any snaps for yesterday. I only see a
snaps from 1/21 and then snaps from today 1/28. I tried the zip file from
1/21 but it crashed also. It
Andi,
are you going to release PHP5RC1 this week or on Monday? As far as I remember
you said that it will be released at the end of January and this week is the
last week of January.
Thanks,
Andrey
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit:
Hi internals,
casting an object to array gives the possibility to get the values of protected/private
member variables :
?php
class some {
public $pub = 1;
protected $prot = 2;
private $priv = 3;
}
var_dump((array)new some());
?
Produces :
array(3) {
[pub]=
int(1)
Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 16:44:29 +0100
Andrey Hristov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMO, when casting to array with (array) only the public-ly visible
members should returned.
Dunno, E_STRICT (as you can access them without notice/warning without
this flag)?
In the same manner
Hi,
Stefan Walk wrote:
This has been discussed on internals before.
See http://www.zend.com/lists/php-dev/200310/msg00026.html and
follow-ups.
Thanks for pointing out this discussion.
Andrey
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit:
Hi,
Hans Lellelid wrote:
Is there any way to have an _interface_ implement or extend multiple
interfaces? This was working as of PHP5b3, but seems to work no longer
as of latest snapshot I downloaded.
The only way to do it before was to have an interface implement other
interfaces:
interface
Hi,
Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 01:18 PM 1/14/2004 +0100, Andrey Hristov wrote:
I prefer waiting for RC1 to start a new-features branch. At least we
then know that we're on the right track. There are still some minor
changes going on (besides bug fixes) in tidy and SimpleXML.
What change do you want
Hi internals,
follows a message (note from the php.net site which was rejected)
It contains a patch to add SNMP v2c support. I have no knowledge of
SNMP but I think someone can review and say whether it's good or not,
or maybe it can be applied if it's ok.
Original URL :
Hi internals,
I know HEAD is freezed, but anyway to ask
whether a new function in_array_all() can be added.
It works like in_array() but checks whether all needles
are in the stack array.
Diff : http://www.hristov.com/andrey/projects/php_stuff/in_array_all.diff.txt
Best wishes,
Andrey
--
PHP
Hi Christian,
Christian Schneider wrote:
Andrey Hristov wrote:
It works like in_array() but checks whether all needles
are in the stack array.
Looking at the prototype:
bool in_array_all(mixed needle1[, mixed needle2], mixed haystack [, bool
strict])
I'd say if (and I'm personally -1
Hi,
just a correction, I meant array_diff when i wrote array_intersect.
array_diff is more handy since just count($res)==0 is enough, $res is the
returned array of array_diff().
Andrey
Andrey Hristov wrote:
So, I did now some testing. Looks like in_array_all() is 6x faster than
array_intersect
Hi Andrei :)
Andrei Zmievski wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Andrey Hristov wrote:
Hi,
just a correction, I meant array_diff when i wrote array_intersect.
array_diff is more handy since just count($res)==0 is enough, $res is the
returned array of array_diff().
Did you actually try array_intersect
Hi,
I didn't write this function to be faster. You asked about array_intersect()
and I decided to bechmark (you didn't ask for it though). What I had in mind
when I decided to write it was to escape this :
if (in_array(some_element, $haystack) in_array(other_element, $haystack)
Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 06:43 PM 1/8/2004 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Wez Furlong wrote:
As Stas mentioned, I'm not sure that this is a good idea, unless
we split some of these things out of ext/standard and into their
own extensions; ext/std_regex, ext/std_string (for
Hi Dan,
there is something borked. mysql_drop_db() is deprecated and on the
doc page there is a note :
[snip]
Warning
This function will not be available if the MySQL extension was built against a MySQL 4.x
client library.
[/snip]
There is something borked with the libs that you use?
Andrey
Happy new year internals,
on 31st I filled a bug report named PHP in CLI mode uses output_buffering
the bug number is 26755 : http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=26755 . Few minutes
ago Edin submitted a patch that fixes the behaviour for PHP5 but we decided
to ask whether it is suitable to merge this
Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 10:24 PM 12/18/2003 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:
In any case, I do think that the custom error handler being called
for any
error is bogus. Why should E_STRICT or E_NOTICES be sent to the
handler if
they are off?
So you're
Christian Schneider wrote:
Andrey Hristov wrote:
Look like I am an weirdo :) with an web farm of servers which log
every NOTICE that appear. And even I think it was possible to catch
a fatal error that happens in a required file with the way the
error handler works now.
And what exactly keeps
Stig S. Bakken wrote:
Good question. Having an error handling function becomes really
expensive if your code is not E_ALL-clean in a loop or something.
if you set a custom error handler you know what you are doing
and probably don't have such places in the code :)
IMHO the error_reporting
Christian Schneider wrote:
Andrey Hristov wrote:
Good question. Having an error handling function becomes really
expensive if your code is not E_ALL-clean in a loop or something.
if you set a custom error handler you know what you are doing
and probably don't have such places in the code
Hi devs,
this night i saw that the BC of strrpos()/strripos()
is broken by a patch commited by pollita 7 months ago :
http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/php-src/ext/standard/string.c?login=2r1=1.370r2=1.371ty=u
The documenation of both function states if the second parameter is an
integer instead of
Sara Golemon wrote:
The documenation of both function states if the second parameter is an
integer instead of string then its value is used as a ord of the character
to be used during the search. This no more true with HEAD.
Good catch. This should not have been broken, I'll fix this.
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
The benchmark suite is available at
http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/PHP_Benchmark/
I added results with the Zend Optimizer 2.1.0.
Hi Sebastian,
could you add a package (tar.gz, zip, tar.bz2, whatever)
to be easy for the end user
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Christian Schneider wrote:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
I don't believe in saving characters.
Agreed, it's not about saving characters (only).
Anyway, it's no biggy and if most people here think it shouldn't be
added then that's fine with me.
Ok, a quick head count gave
Jaap van Ganswijk wrote:
At 2003-11-05 09:59 +0100, Michael Walter wrote:
Very cool.
How about supporting .. syntax, btw. as in [1..3] or [a..z]? Might no be the worth, just thinking out loud ;)
I'm also in favor of a shorter notation for array() and list().
In fact this also helps to
Hi,
correct me if I am wrong but yesterday I read in a book related to
Software Engineering
(something called like Classical and Object Oriented Software
Engineering with examples in C++)
that there was decision that programming languages will be spelled
lowecase with the first character
in
Manfred Stienstra wrote:
Hi,
As some might remember from last week, I'm trying to develop a php
extension, but I'm having a little trouble getting it compiled...
/home/dwerg/code/2003/monetdb/php-4.3.3/ext/monet/monet.c:42: error:
`zif_monet_connect' undeclared here (not in a function)
201 - 300 of 312 matches
Mail list logo
