Re: [PHP-DEV] Should we rethink the 50%+1 requirement for non-"language changes"?

2016-01-30 Thread Joe Constant
ut I would say perhaps they just saw no value in it. If a proposal isn't offering enough value for the greater community, maybe it doesn't belong in core and should be either a pecl extension or userland code? Joe Constant On Jan 30, 2016, at 10:34 AM, Andrea Faulds wrote: Hi ev

Re: [PHP-DEV] Should we rethink the 50%+1 requirement for non-"language changes"?

2016-01-30 Thread Joe Constant
I understand that they may not be interested, but if the voter turnout is really that low, the proponents should be doing more to drum up interest rather than simply allowing an RFC to pass. Joe Constant On Jan 30, 2016, at 12:14 PM, Jakub Zelenka wrote: On 30 Jan 2016 18:07, "Joe Constant