Hi all,
PHP grammar is far from being complex. It is possible to describe most
of the syntax with a simple explanation.
Example:
* We can separate a program into several statements.
* There're a couple of items that cannot be declared into different
places (namespace, use), so consider them as
/docs/books/jls/second_edition/html/syntax.doc.html
Cheers,
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 2:20 PM, guilhermebla...@gmail.com
guilhermebla...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
PHP grammar is far from being complex. It is possible to describe most
of the syntax with a simple explanation.
Example:
* We can
+1 for next major, but not for middle point release. =)
2010/11/29 Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com:
my +1 for new major version only, btw :)
2010/11/27 Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com:
+1 if While technically possible this RFC suggests that the following
shall NOT be valid for keeping the
,
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Richard Quadling rquadl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 November 2010 07:06, Zeev Suraski z...@zend.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 1:45 AM
To: Zeev Suraski
Cc: guilhermebla
Hi Larry,
For existent project examples and usage, here are 2 links of the
upcoming versions of Doctrine 2 and Symfony 2:
http://www.doctrine-project.org/projects/orm/2.0/docs/reference/basic-mapping/en#introduction-to-docblock-annotations
http://docs.symfony-reloaded.org/guides/validator.html
/guides/validator.html (at the end of
HTML file)
Cheers,
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:00 PM, la...@garfieldtech.com
la...@garfieldtech.com wrote:
On 11/18/10 7:34 AM, guilhermebla...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Larry,
For existent project examples and usage, here are 2 links of the
upcoming versions
of
votes to people with PHP karma, so meritocracy is perfectly being
counted here.
Please stick to your vote and let other people vote. Do not close this
thread, again.
Cheers,
Zeev
-Original Message-
From: guilhermebla...@gmail.com [mailto:guilhermebla...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday
Hi Lester,
If you READ my first email of this thread, you'll find out I do not
speak about new syntax, etc.
No matter if you say that can be done through docblock, you're
automatically saying +1 to this thread.
Please re-read the topic and vote. Thanks.
Cheers,
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:38
@Chad: You're getting me wrong here.
If results of poll decide for OK to meta attribute support, next poll
would be which implementation to choose.
I can find 3 different implementations that we can choose, but anyone
is free to contribute.
- Docblock
/** @Foo */
class User { ... }
- New
global decisions.
Cheers,
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 3:47 PM, guilhermebla...@gmail.com
guilhermebla...@gmail.com wrote:
@Chad: You're getting me wrong here.
If results of poll decide for OK to meta attribute support, next poll
would be which implementation to choose.
I can find 3 different
Hi Stas,
A full RFC will be written based on results of polls.
I'm able to write 10 RFC's, but none will care until we reach this
list with a patch.
So instead of lose time, I prefer to discuss what can be done here,
write an RFC then finally implement it.
But without having feedback from core
Hi Stas,
Ok, so you think I should just consider everyone want some sort of
meta attribute support and start discussing the topics?
Should I separate it in different threads or put it all here?
The subject is big and I identify at least 5 different discussions
that can diverge.
Cheers,
On Wed,
that
Metadata doesn't have value.
What are the 5 different discussion topics you are thinking of, just out of
curiosity?
Also, I can just post my syntax idea as a gist or pastie or something
instead of making an rfc...
-Alec
On 11/16/2010 9:29 PM, guilhermebla...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Stas,
Ok
Hi Gustavo,
Normal instantiation cannot be done.
Here is a sample where it would fail:
new Foo()
class User { ... }
So it must be something different.
[]s,
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Gustavo Lopes glo...@nebm.ist.utl.pt wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 01:54:22 -, Stas Malyshev
Hi folks,
I'll start a series of topics (in this thread) about meta attribute
(aka. Annotations) discussion.
So as soon as we agree on each topic I'll open another point to be discussed.
Only when we reach some consensus I'll open another topic discussion.
I suggest to have a poll for each topic,
of
annotations - and there simply isn't.
Zeev
-Original Message-
From: guilhermebla...@gmail.com [mailto:guilhermebla...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 7:08 PM
To: PHP internals
Subject: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 - Meta attribute (aka. Annotations) support
discussion
Hi folks
@Will: Patch works perfectly with PHP 5.3. There is just a minor issue
related to APC not caching instances.
That patch didn't reach a consensus and that's why I opened a
different thread to implement a patch based on poll results.
Cheers,
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Will Fitch
Hi Derick,
I'm all for it.
Although I have karma, I'm not an active PHP core contributor, but I
would like to participate of such discussion, mainly because I have
plenty experience with Annotations from another languages.
I'll spend some time re-reading the entire Annotations thread and come
up
201 - 218 of 218 matches
Mail list logo
